@Suzianne
What analogy best explains how the concept of the "free gift" works or what it means?
You are invited to offer one, Suzianne.
This is what I came up with.
The "free gift" of "salvation" is like a complementary plane ticket. It is free. You don't have to pay for it. It will take you to the ultimate destination. It will never be cancelled by the person who paid for it.
Obviously, if you don't think it is real and throw it away, despite it being a free gift, then there will be no journey to the destination.
To get to that ultimate destination, however, the invited passengers must still pack their bags, order a taxi, get to the airport, check their luggage in, make their way to the departure lounge, and board the plane.
Without the packing, the taxi, the trip, the check-in, the departure lounge, and the boarding, the potential passenger will never reach the "ultimate destination", even though the free ticket was there, gratis, available, and not rescinded or cancelled.
Does the fact that someone has a free ticket and can fly at no expense aboard a plane to the ultimate destination mean that they will necessarily or automatically take up the donor's offer of this free gift and do what needs to be done to catch the plane?
No, it doesn't. Some people will board the plane and some won't. Simply believing that the ticket is free and authentic and valid and that it could take you to the ultimate destination is not enough.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI don't think divegeester would consider what I said to be "lying".
I think Dive would consider that lying.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think you consciously lied about that.
In the controversial thread where I said 'Dive's fingerprints were all over this' I was, 'just calling it how I saw it.' Dive still considered that lying.
@fmf saidNo I didn't. Like you, I was just calling it how I saw it. Why is that ok for you but not for me?
I think you consciously lied about that.
@fmf saidOr highlight your hypocrisy.
It would seem that Suzianne and Ghost of a Duke have turned up together to make off-topic remarks.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI believe you were lying. I don't think that you saying you were calling it how you saw it alters this. The difference between us is that when I say I am calling something as I see it, it is not followed by a lie.
No I didn't. Like you, I was just calling it how I saw it. Why is that ok for you but not for me?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou are not using the word "hypocrisy" correctly.
Or highlight your hypocrisy.
@fmf saidI believe you have lied in this thread.
I believe you were lying. I don't think that you saying you were calling it how you saw it alters this. The difference between us is that when I say I am calling something as I see it, it is not followed by a lie.