@ghost-of-a-duke saidNope. You are lying about this. divegeester had absolutely nothing to do with the making of the show. You know it now, and you knew it back then. You were just being spiteful.
You are wrong on this. I was pretty certain, based on how the pair of you operated and still operate.
The idea that I would do something with my radio show that was affected in any way by the comings and goings on this message board ~ aside from recruiting a few friends to write onions ~ makes you sound puerile.
You didn't think divegeester was involved. You were just being vindictive.
22 Feb 23
@fmf saidAgain, you are wrong on this. Out of the two of us, I am best placed to say what I believed. I know you think you have some special power to decipher who does and doesn't speak the truth, but this is entirely in your own head. Indeed, there have been occasions when you have clearly lied yourself about matters, leading me to have little faith in your honesty or integrity.
Nope. You are lying about this. divegeester had absolutely nothing to do with the making of the show. You know it now, and you knew it back then. You were just being spiteful.
The idea that I would do something with my radio show that was affected in any way by the comings and goings on this message board ~ aside from recruiting a few friends to write onions ~ makes you sound puerile.
You didn't think divegeester was involved. You were just being vindictive.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116970
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI don’t want to get into this in a lengthy exchange on this, but if I maligned you in a large private group in which you weren’t present, saying things which were completely untrue about you, you would very likely say I was lying about you. I doubt very much that your later response would be along the lines of ‘it’s ok it was just his perception’. The responsibility to check your facts sits firmly with you.
In the controversial thread where I said 'Dive's fingerprints were all over this' I was, 'just calling it how I saw it.' Dive still considered that lying.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou are mistaken.
Indeed, there have been occasions when you have clearly lied yourself about matters, leading me to have little faith in your honesty or integrity.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke said[I] have little faith in your honesty or integrity.
Again, you are wrong on this. Out of the two of us, I am best placed to say what I believed. I know you think you have some special power to decipher who does and doesn't speak the truth, but this is entirely in your own head. Indeed, there have been occasions when you have clearly lied yourself about matters, leading me to have little faith in your honesty or integrity.
All because you and I disagreed about Suzianne in private and I used a spoonerism as a pseudonym so I could put a second onion of yours in the show.
@divegeester saidI find this laughable to be honest, seeing how you frequently prejudge people without evidence and state your own perceptions as if they were a matter of fact.
I don’t want to get into this in a lengthy exchange on this, but if I maligned you in a large private group in which you weren’t present, saying things which were completely untrue about you, you would very likely say I was lying about you. I doubt very much that your later response would be along the lines of ‘it’s ok it was just his perception’. The responsibility to check your facts sits firmly with you.
Most of what we post here are unsubstantiated opinions or assumptions. At the time I believed what I posted. In no way could that be classified as a lie.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou have made it clear - repeatedly so - that your intent was vindictive and vengeful because, several times when confronted about your lie behind divegeester's back about him, and your attempt, behind my back, to sabotage the radio show, you have said....
No, I don't think so.
"Don't mess with the Ghost".
You haven't even tried to disguise your motivation: petty revenge... all because you got bent out of shape on an online message board.
22 Feb 23
@fmf saidThis merely shows you have zero sense of humour, and doesn't change the fact that everything occurred due to your own petty vindictiveness.
You have made it clear - repeatedly so - that your intent was vindictive and vengeful because, several times when confronted about your lie behind divegeester's back about him, and your attempt, behind my back, to sabotage the radio show, you have said....
"Don't mess with the Ghost".
You haven't even tried to disguise your motivation: petty revenge... all because you got bent out of shape on an online message board.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI did nothing "vindictive".
This merely shows you have zero sense of humour, and doesn't change the fact that everything occurred due to your own petty vindictiveness.
Your "Don't mess with the Ghost" banter demonstrates that you know you did.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAs I say, I did nothing whatsoever that was vindictive. You have been barking up the wrong tree for two and a half years.
Vindictiveness positively oozed out of you.
I think you should hold your hands up to this and apologize.