The Trump Classified Records Indictment

The Trump Classified Records Indictment

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9609
15 Jun 23
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
lets not forget the fbi helped biden hide his having these documents till after the election
Corrupt cops. We should crack down. They should be held accountable. Repealing laws that protect cops for their misconduct would be a good start.

I can't personally advocate for these changes because I back the blue. You should though. Tell your representative to repeal immunity laws for law enforcement and defund the police.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
15 Jun 23

@mott-the-hoople said
lets not forget the fbi helped biden hide his having these documents till after the election
Where did you come up with that? There's nothing in the McCarthy (a longtime Republican Trump water carrier) article supporting such a claim. In fact, it claims the FBI wasn't even informed of the documents being found in the Penn Center until after NARA had retrieved them.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
15 Jun 23

@mott-the-hoople said
Lets recap what happened… the staterun media is trying to change the narrative..,

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3827051-the-truth-about-bidens-document-debacle-he-didnt-self-report/
The article is ridiculous; no, Biden didn't inform the DOJ he had committed any crime because he didn't - he contacted NARA and arranged for the documents to be picked up.

If Trump had simply done that, he never would have been charged.

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142854
15 Jun 23

@metal-brain said
More election meddling? Interesting.
Got a link about it?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/20/us/politics/biden-classified-documents.html

Immigration Central

tinyurl.com/muzppr8z

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26701
16 Jun 23

@mott-the-hoople said
so Smashing phones, wiping hard drives and deleting emails that have been subpoenaed is normal business?
"so >Smashing< phones"

You ignorant fool.

Immigration Central

tinyurl.com/muzppr8z

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26701
16 Jun 23

https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=23846793-usa-v-trump-and-nauta-trans

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36841
16 Jun 23

@metal-brain said
More election meddling? Interesting.
Got a link about it?
I don't think that means what you think it means.

Funny, Donald uses the phrase incorrectly too.

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142854
365d

@wildgrass said
Corrupt cops. We should crack down. They should be held accountable. Repealing laws that protect cops for their misconduct would be a good start.

I can't personally advocate for these changes because I back the blue. You should though. Tell your representative to repeal immunity laws for law enforcement and defund the police.
stupid

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142854
365d

@athousandyoung said
"so >Smashing< phones"

You ignorant fool.
oh its true my queer friend

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/09/05/hillary-clinton-email-device-destuction-nr-sot.cnn

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22067
365d

@no1marauder
You cannot prove “unauthorized possession,” as required under the statute.

Section 793(e) requires the government to prove that the Defendant KNEW he had National Defense Information (NDI) in his possession, and also that the Defendant KNEW that there was a government official entitled to receive the Information, and also that the Defendant then WILLFULLY failed to deliver it to that official.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
365d

@metal-brain said
@no1marauder
You cannot prove “unauthorized possession,” as required under the statute.

Section 793(e) requires the government to prove that the Defendant KNEW he had National Defense Information (NDI) in his possession, and also that the Defendant KNEW that there was a government official entitled to receive the Information, and also that the Defendant then WILLFULLY failed to deliver it to that official.
LMAO! Read the indictment where it describes Trump showing US military war plans to a writer; on tape he says the material is "secret,".

Trump knew full well he was supposed to turn over such documents; NARA had been insisting on its return for well over a year before the Grand Jury subpoena. Proving the elements you mention will be the least of Smith's worries.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22067
365d
1 edit

@no1marauder said
LMAO! Read the indictment where it describes Trump showing US military war plans to a writer; on tape he says the material is "secret,".

Trump knew full well he was supposed to turn over such documents; NARA had been insisting on its return for well over a year before the Grand Jury subpoena. Proving the elements you mention will be the least of Smith's worries.
How does that compare to the Petraeus scandal?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/04/23/timeline-general-david-petraeus-paula-broadwell-jill-kelley/26245095/

https://rumble.com/v2ubj74-tucker-reveals-trump-indictment-is-a-sham.html

Biden knew full well he was supposed to turn over such documents. Mike Pence knew full well he was supposed to turn over such documents. Stop repeating irrelevancies like a parrot.

"NARA had been insisting on its return for well over a year"

Insisting? No. Reminding. Nobody insists for that long. Insisting implies they were fed up with waiting. There is absolutely no evidence of that at all. That fact they didn't resort to drastic measures makes the evident. The only reason NARA got the DOJ involved is because Trump gave them the classified documents that allowed them to.

That actually is consistent with a person that was not aware he was in possession of those classified documents. I have no idea who alleged Trump showed classified documents to or even if it is true. That news is new to me, but I do remember people making a big stink about Trump showing Putin classified information even though he was POTUS at the time and had every legal right to do just that. Some people just didn't like it.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
365d

@metal-brain said
How does that compare to the Petraeus scandal?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/04/23/timeline-general-david-petraeus-paula-broadwell-jill-kelley/26245095/

https://rumble.com/v2ubj74-tucker-reveals-trump-indictment-is-a-sham.html

Biden knew full well he was supposed to turn over such documents. Mike Pence knew full well he was supposed to turn ove ...[text shortened]... he was POTUS at the time and had every legal right to do just that. Some people just didn't like it.
LMAO! Keep relying on Tucker Carlson. I've already dealt with your false whataboutisms and won't waste further time on them.

Trump didn't know that secret military war plans were "national defense information"? Good luck with that argument to a jury.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22067
365d

@no1marauder said
LMAO! Keep relying on Tucker Carlson. I've already dealt with your false whataboutisms and won't waste further time on them.

Trump didn't know that secret military war plans were "national defense information"? Good luck with that argument to a jury.
Run away with your tail between your legs again. I know you cannot defend the hypocrisy and that is why you call it whataboutism. That is obviously a term that says "stop calling me out on my hypocrisy" and we all know it.

You don't want to talk about the Petraeus scandal. Is it because it did not result in a felony conviction? Petraeus was not even president. He had less excuse for it than Trump. Sorry to take the wind out of your sails of hate dude, but Trump will likely see no jail time.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
364d
2 edits

@metal-brain said
Run away with your tail between your legs again. I know you cannot defend the hypocrisy and that is why you call it whataboutism. That is obviously a term that says "stop calling me out on my hypocrisy" and we all know it.

You don't want to talk about the Petraeus scandal. Is it because it did not result in a felony conviction? Petraeus was not even president. He had ...[text shortened]... rump. Sorry to take the wind out of your sails of hate dude, but Trump will likely see no jail time.
Petraeus, unlike Trump, was actually authorized to have the classified information and was charged with the lesser offense of 18 USC 1924. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924

And he was charged and pled guilty to a felony not given the pass you want Trump given.

Apple meet orange.