The Trump Classified Records Indictment

The Trump Classified Records Indictment

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
15 Jun 23

@metal-brain said
Both Biden and Trump violated the Presidential Records Act and had in their possession classified records that should have been with the National Archives. Returning them promptly does not change that fact. Trump did not refuse to return the documents. At most he stalled returning them by multiple delays through his lawyer.

You just hate Trump for some reason. His pol ...[text shortened]... me too, but I do not have an unhealthy hatred for him like you. Why do you have such hatred for him?
Like Biden, Trump was not charged with retaining any national defense document he voluntarily relinquished.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22064
15 Jun 23

@vivify said
Charged with what? Be specific.
Withholding a Document or Record (18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(b)(2)(A), 2)

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22064
15 Jun 23

@no1marauder said
Like Biden, Trump was not charged with retaining any national defense document he voluntarily relinquished.
Once again, Trump did not refuse to return the documents. He was just delaying it pending a legal attempt to assert executive privilege. Also, the assertion that Biden promptly returned the documents he was holding was only after he was caught. He had them for a very long time, longer than Trump has his.

Trump was trying to see what he could get away with legally before handing them over. That is all. Hardly something that warrants a conviction. It was a delay, not a refusal.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9609
15 Jun 23

@no1marauder said
They are described in the indictment you refuse to read.
It's superb toddler logic. If it cannot be seen, then it does not exist. Peekaboo!!!

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
15 Jun 23

@metal-brain said
Withholding a Document or Record (18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(b)(2)(A), 2)
Clearly inapplicable in that it requires knowing conduct with the intent to withhold said documents from an official proceeding.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22064
15 Jun 23

@wildgrass said
It's superb toddler logic. If it cannot be seen, then it does not exist. Peekaboo!!!
I read it and he knows it. How do you think I was able to find the date of the excerpt he quoted from it to prove him wrong? He is just repeating that randomly like a parrot. He even got suzi to repeat the same thing like a parrot and I know she never read it.

Like a parrot no1 is not a bright creature. He just repeats stuff mindlessly.

rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12351
15 Jun 23

@metal-brain said
Withholding a Document or Record (18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(b)(2)(A), 2)
Biden didn't withhold documents he complied when asked to turn them over.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22064
15 Jun 23

@no1marauder said
Clearly inapplicable in that it requires knowing conduct with the intent to withhold said documents from an official proceeding.
LOL! He knew he had them. Or are you claiming he could not remember he had them because of dementia? LOL! The dementia defense. Hilarious!

An official proceeding? What official proceeding?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22064
15 Jun 23

@vivify said
Biden didn't withhold documents he complied when asked to turn them over.
How many years after he took them?

rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12351
15 Jun 23

@metal-brain said
How many years after he took them?
Biden complied with the requests immediately. Unlike Trump.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
15 Jun 23

@metal-brain said
Once again, Trump did not refuse to return the documents. He was just delaying it pending a legal attempt to assert executive privilege. Also, the assertion that Biden promptly returned the documents he was holding was only after he was caught. He had them for a very long time, longer than Trump has his.

Trump was trying to see what he could get away with legally befor ...[text shortened]... them over. That is all. Hardly something that warrants a conviction. It was a delay, not a refusal.
That's BS. He conspired to retain the documents even going so far as to have his lawyers falsely certify that all classified materials in his possession had been surrendered in response to the Grand Jury subpoena. Only those national defense materials which the government had to obtain by mandatory legal process from Trump are included in the charges; no such mandatory processes were required to obtain the return of the materials from Biden.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
15 Jun 23
1 edit

@metal-brain said
LOL! He knew he had them. Or are you claiming he could not remember he had them because of dementia? LOL! The dementia defense. Hilarious!

An official proceeding? What official proceeding?
Exactly. If you read the statute you'd know the lack of any official proceeding the documents were relevant to makes the statute irrelevant to Biden.

There's no evidence Biden knew he had classified materials. He wasn't showing US military plans to writers.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22064
15 Jun 23

@no1marauder
Once again. What official proceeding? Be specific.

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36841
15 Jun 23

@mott-the-hoople said
can you direct me to these documents Trump is alleged to have had?
Read the indictment.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22064
15 Jun 23

@vivify said
Biden complied with the requests immediately. Unlike Trump.
Biden was withholding classified documents for years. How soon he handed them over after he got caught does not change the fact he withheld classified documents he was not supposed to have. That is like saying you should not be charged with possession of cocaine because you handed it over sooner than the other guy.

Withholding a Document or Record (18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(b)(2)(A), 2)

Once again, do you think Biden should be charged for Withholding a Document or Record?