@sonship saidAnytime you feel honest enough to explain who these beings are on other worlds who are being deterred, please let the forum know.
@divegeester
As to what I feel comfortable with or not comfortable with - My subjective feeling of relative comfort or discomfort does not change in the least what the Bible teaches about Isaiah 66:22-24; or Daniel 12:2; or Rev. 14:9-12; or Rev. 21:1; Rev. 21:8; or Rev. 20:15
Meantime I guess we will all just assume you made it up and now are running away from the scrutiny of your waffle.
Short version:
Sonship claims that their are beings/persons on other worlds who are being deterred from wrong doing by observing the eternal torture meted out by his version of Jesus on or around this particular world.
Yeah, sounds like it’s not something found in the Bible doesn’t it. I thought so too.
@divegeester
Over the years the weightier issues like the triune nature of God, you found difficult to refute. So instead you developed more sensational issues by which you thought to generate scandalous discredit against me. I expect on the Triune God you have learned not to challenge but on space aliens you hope will generate the disgrace, dishonor and scandal to damage me.
I think it is a rather cowardly excuse distraction you employ a sensational red herring to substitute your inability to refute the biblical revelation of three-oneness of God.
@sonship saidI have fully refuted your man made belief in a multiheaded god from a scriptural pov.
@divegeester
Over the years the weightier issues like the triune nature of God, you found difficult to refute.
@sonship saidSuch as, for example?
@divegeester
So instead you developed more sensational issues by which you thought to generate scandalous discredit against me.
@sonship saidThese are you claims about other worlds, not mine. If you cannot robustly stand behind your claims then you should not make them.
@divegeester
I expect on the Triune God you have learned not to challenge but on space aliens you hope will generate the disgrace, dishonor and scandal to damage me.
@sonship saidIt’s not a binary argument and you are being dishonest in suggesting it is.
@divegeester
I think it is a rather cowardly excuse distraction you employ a sensational red herring to substitute your inability to refute the biblical revelation of three-oneness of God.
@divegeester saidShow me how you stand by your obliteration of the office of the Son of God teaching.
These are you claims about other worlds, not mine. If you cannot robustly stand behind your claims then you should not make them.
After the millennial kingdom will there exist the man Jesus as the Son of God ?
If I misunderstand then clarify.
That modalistic teaching of "No Son of God in eternity" is as bad as any three-headed statute you want to pin on lovers of the Triune God.
For some reason I think you're not going to explain yourself. For some reason I have a suspicion that you won't even try. Or maybe you'll claim you did way back when sometime ago - successfully of course.
@sonship saidI’ve done it before, but sure, start a thread on it and I will contribute.
Show me how you stand by your obliteration of the office of the Son of God teaching.