@fmf saidIf you don't understand the question, that's fine but don't bore us by thinking that you do.
No one is proposing to engage in "burning" transgender people; such a hyperbolic strawman does not make for a reasonable discussion.
However, if sexual activity by transgender people is classed as "fornication" and is, therefore, in Christian terms categorized as "sinful" behaviour, then I don't see why Jesus would have approved of it while he was alive.
@suzianne saidJust because Jesus intervened in the stoning of the woman who was accused of adultery doesn't mean that adultery is not a "sinful". One surely cannot willfully live a life as an adulterer and "be truly Christian" at the same time, right? One surely cannot practice witchcraft and "be truly Christian" at the same time, regardless of whether Jesus would have approved of burning witches.
FMF's condescension aside, answer my question.
1 edit
@fmf saidStop boring me to death and let Joseph answer the question, if you don't mind.
No one is talking about "burning" anyone. if sexual activity by transgender people is classed as "fornication" and is, to a Christian, "sinful" behaviour, then I don't see why Jesus would have approved of it while he was alive.
Again, the question is, as aimed at Joseph, not FMF, Do you think Jesus would approve of witch-burning?
THIRD time asking.
@fmf saidWill you shut up and let the man answer my question??
Just because Jesus intervened in the stoning of the woman who was accused of adultery doesn't mean that adultery is not a "sinful". One surely cannot willfully live a life as an adulterer and "be truly Christian" at the same time, right? One surely cannot practice witchcraft and "be truly Christian" at the same time, regardless of whether Jesus would have approved of burning witches.
