@suziannesaid One person's misunderstanding, believed by another through the first person's zealotry, is not a conspiracy, no. But then, no one said it was.
Instead of all this silliness about “zealotry”, why not just show some maturity and stop telling ludicrous stories about yourself.
Or… go and finish your masters and help the homeless in downtown Phoenix.
@divegeestersaid Instead of all this silliness about “zealotry”, why not just show some maturity and stop telling ludicrous stories about yourself.
Or… go and finish your masters and help the homeless in downtown Phoenix.
Would it be fair to say that when people share personal things about their lives you view it as a weakness you can repeatedly poke with a stick when you run our of salient arguments?
@ghost-of-a-dukesaid Would it be fair to say that when people share personal things about their lives you view it as a weakness you can repeatedly poke with a stick when you run our of salient arguments?
No that would be a fair thing to say.
What is a fair thing to say is if someone has repeatedly posted credulous claims about themself whilst also adopting a “Karen”-like approach to dealing with their detractors, then they should I probably expect to roll with the exchanges they find themselves in.
@divegeestersaid No that would be a fair thing to say.
What is a fair thing to say is if someone has repeatedly posted credulous claims about themself whilst also adopting a “Karen”-like approach to dealing with their detractors, then they should I probably expect to roll with the exchanges they find themselves in.
Do you ever worry, as an altruistic soul, you are ridiculing actual events?
@divegeestersaid What is a fair thing to say is if someone has repeatedly posted credulous claims about themself whilst also adopting a “Karen”-like approach to dealing with their detractors, then they should I probably expect to roll with the exchanges they find themselves in.
If 'any' poster on this site disclosed details of a past trauma I would (by default) give them the benefit of the doubt and either express empathy or say nothing, even if I wasn't convinced by their account. (Just in case the account was genuine).
@ghost-of-a-dukesaid If 'any' poster on this site disclosed details of a past trauma I would (by default) give them the benefit of the doubt and either express empathy or say nothing, even if I wasn't convinced by their account. (Just in case the account was genuine).
And yet, you didn’t give me the benefit of the doubt when you had that one chance to do so.
@divegeestersaid And yet, you didn’t give me the benefit of the doubt when you had that one chance to do so.
"If 'any' poster on this site disclosed details of a past trauma I would (by default) give them the benefit of the doubt and either express empathy or say nothing, even if I wasn't convinced by their account. (Just in case the account was genuine). "
If you adhered to the above, we'd probably be exchanging Christmas cards.
20 Mar '23 05:21
Males only thread.
Back to Top