18 Mar '23 20:01>
@earl-of-trumps saidYou and Rusty should hang out.
what a thrill.
@earl-of-trumps saidI concur Earl, this site is meant for everyone men women and children over 13.
what a thrill.
I think 90% of the threads in here are male only.
@divegeester saidYou don't feel the slightest bit sorry for leading him down the primrose path to a story that's not true?
He disagrees with you Suzianne, is that a crime?
@suzianne saidI haven’t led Shallow Blue to anything; he just doesn’t happen believe your stories about yourself anymore than I do.
You don't feel the slightest bit sorry for leading him down the primrose path to a story that's not true?
@fmf saidI don't know who alerted it the first time but I alerted it the second time for giggles.
Why was this post alerted?
@a-unique-nickname saidIf it was removed both times it was alerted, there had to be a reason.
I don't know who alerted it the first time but I alerted it the second time for giggles.
@suzianne saidThere are some very gullible people for sure. 🙂
You don't feel the slightest bit sorry for leading him down the primrose path to a story that's not true?
I don't know why anyone believes anything you say anymore. It's a complete mystery.
@divegeester saidMy wife reckons I am a palistinian lesbian seamstres in a male body, hung like an arab donkey and goes like a sewing machine.
Females and non binary people can start their as many of their own threads of course, but this thread is strictly only for those identifying males and is exclusively about male matters and things of a manly nature.
@divegeester saidBecause, for some reason he believes what you say about me over what I say about me.
I haven’t led Shallow Blue to anything; he just doesn’t happen believe your stories about yourself anymore than I do.
@suzianne saidTwo people stating that they don’t believe your published fantasies about yourself is not a conspiracy Suzianne.
Because, for some reason he believes what you say about me over what I say about me.
@divegeester saidDid he state that?!
Two people stating that they don’t believe your published fantasies about yourself is not a conspiracy Suzianne.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNo idea, I’m replying to Suzianne saying … and I quote:
Did he state that?!
@divegeester saidOne person's misunderstanding, believed by another through the first person's zealotry, is not a conspiracy, no. But then, no one said it was.
No idea, I’m replying to Suzianne saying … and I quote:
“Because, for some reason he believes what you say about me over what I say about me.”
As I replied; it’s not a conspiracy.
@divegeester saidOver-reliance on something made-up by you.
Two people stating that they don’t believe your published fantasies about yourself is not a conspiracy Suzianne.