@divegeester saidThe people who wrote the Bible didn’t understand where the “sky, the earth and themselves came from, they invented Gods who created them”
As I replied to this point earlier (perhaps you missed it), the fact that something is complex is not an excuse to replace a scientific explanation with a metaphysical or even religious one.
Because early man didn’t understand where the sky, the earth and themselves came from, they invented...Gods who created them.
What you are saying here is exactly the same thing ...[text shortened]... ot the same thing - and I confess to including the word “complex” as a bait to draw this out. Sorry.
Are they the “early man” your referring to?
Just my opinion but any religion is the antithesis of spirit and spirituality. Whatever spirit is, supposing it exists, it cannot be put in a box created by corporeal man.
@divegeester saidNo, it isn't. Psychology is the study of the psyche, which itself relates to the sense of self, of conscious personality, of spirit. This has its roots deeper than your chosen religion. (Going back to the early Greeks).
The “sense of self” is not called “spirit”, this is your own personal conflation. To conflate “spirit” as in a person’s character, sense of self determination etc, with a spiritual soul, is downright delusional.
I’m surprised you are even attempting it.
@divegeester saidYou just happen to call the “sense of self” etc. a "soul" because that's how your religion frames it.
The “sense of self” is not called “spirit”, this is your own personal conflation. To conflate “spirit” as in a person’s character, sense of self determination etc, with a spiritual soul, is downright delusional.
I’m surprised you are even attempting it.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI’m completely comfortable with you believing in spirits and souls.
No, it isn't. Psychology is the study of the psyche, which itself relates to the sense of self, of conscious personality, of spirit. This has its roots deeper than your chosen religion. (Going back to the early Greeks).
Are you suggesting that psychology is the study of spirits and souls? You are again erroneously conflating the word “spirit” with charter, personality and the sense of consciousness.
@fmf saidIn the instance you were referring to I was referring to Ghost of a Duke using “soul”.
You just happen to call the “sense of self” etc. a "soul" because that's how your religion frames it.
@kevcvs57 saidYes they are and I didn’t mean “early man” as in the normal sense of the term, I meant it in the context of early writings about metaphysical concepts such as gods being use to explain natural phenomena such as evolution.
The people who wrote the Bible didn’t understand where the “sky, the earth and themselves came from, they invented Gods who created them”
Are they the “early man” your referring to?
Just my opinion but any religion is the antithesis of spirit and spirituality. Whatever spirit is, supposing it exists, it cannot be put in a box created by corporeal man.
Similarly I am referring to Ghost of a Duke apparently appealing to the metaphysical and what I would call “supernatural” (in its broadest sense) to explain natural phenomena such as the identification of self, individuality and sense of consciousness. I find it fascinating that a scientifically orientated atheist would appeal to terms such as spirit and soul and other ethereal notions because of my use of “complex” to describe the human brain somehow justifies using these ethereal concepts.
@divegeester saidWell it’s probably that complicated. Many committed Christians are also committed scientists so I think it’s s bit harsh that you cannot be a committed atheist and commit to a spiritual belief out-with the need for a head honcho god spirit.
Yes they are and I didn’t mean “early man” as in the normal sense of the term, I meant it in the context of early writings about metaphysical concepts such as gods being use to explain natural phenomena such as evolution.
Similarly I am referring to Ghost of a Duke apparently appealing to the metaphysical and what I would call “supernatural” (in its broadest sense) to ...[text shortened]... of my use of “complex” to describe the human brain somehow justifies using these ethereal concepts.
Do you believe that you cannot believe in a spiritual dimension, be spiritual, or discuss different options for a spiritual existence without believing in a god or gods?
Atheism is a belief in the non existence of god or gods period.
@divegeester saidPsychology is the study of the psyche, which itself relates to the sense of self, of consciousness. In a religious context you may explain this as the soul, whereas in the context I describe it is the spirit, the inner spark. I fully accept it is not the spirit wrapped in religious dogma, but is spirit nonetheless.
I’m completely comfortable with you believing in spirits and souls.
Are you suggesting that psychology is the study of spirits and souls? You are again erroneously conflating the word “spirit” with charter, personality and the sense of consciousness.
Meditation and mindfulness, for example, are spiritual in the way they focus on the sense of self, of inner consciousness and awareness.
@divegeester saidYou misunderstood. At no point have I appealed to any ethereal notions. You have simply been unable to untangle yourself from such notions due to being a theist.
Yes they are and I didn’t mean “early man” as in the normal sense of the term, I meant it in the context of early writings about metaphysical concepts such as gods being use to explain natural phenomena such as evolution.
Similarly I am referring to Ghost of a Duke apparently appealing to the metaphysical and what I would call “supernatural” (in its broadest sense) to ...[text shortened]... of my use of “complex” to describe the human brain somehow justifies using these ethereal concepts.
Humans are spiritual without anything supernatural being brought to the table.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI disagree.
Humans are spiritual without anything supernatural being brought to the table.
Spirits and souls are supernatural. The essence of things relating to souls is called spirituality. As in spiritualist and spiritualism.
12 Apr 21
@ghost-of-a-duke saidPsychology is a science is it not. Spirits, souls, spiritualism and spirituality are supernatural.
Psychology is the study of the psyche, which itself relates to the sense of self, of consciousness. In a religious context you may explain this as the soul, whereas in the context I describe it is the spirit, the inner spark. I fully accept it is not the spirit wrapped in religious dogma, but is spirit nonetheless.
Meditation and mindfulness, for example, are spiritual in the way they focus on the sense of self, of inner consciousness and awareness.
@kevcvs57 saidThis is a class example of a non-sequitur.
Well it’s probably that complicated. Many committed Christians are also committed scientists so I think it’s s bit harsh that you cannot be a committed atheist and commit to a spiritual belief out-with the need for a head honcho god spirit.
Yes a theist can be a scientist, but it does not logically follow that a scientist can be committed to a spiritual belief.
Unless like ghost of a duke you wish to conflate spirituality with the meditative concepts related to consciousness. Which I maintain are simply cognitive processing.
12 Apr 21
@kevcvs57 saidYes I do believe that, absolutely.
Do you believe that you cannot believe in a spiritual dimension, be spiritual, or discuss different options for a spiritual existence without believing in a god or gods?
Atheism is a belief in the non existence of god or gods period.
But you find me a scientist who believes it.
Besides this is an explosion of the word “spirituality” which I assert gets hijacked by those who do not believe in spirits, souls, or indeed anything supernatural.
12 Apr 21
@divegeester saidOnly through the eyes of a theist.
I disagree.
Spirits and souls are supernatural.
12 Apr 21
@divegeester saidAgain, psychology is to do with the psyche.
Psychology is a science is it not. Spirits, souls, spiritualism and spirituality are supernatural.
'Psyche comes from the Greek psykhe, which means “the soul, mind, spirit, or invisible animating entity which occupies the physical body.'
www.vocabulary.com