02 Jan '20 04:51>
@indonesia-phil saidThe only question remaining, therefore, is whether or not one believes in cod.
That which we must conclude from this clear and unambiguous writing is quite clear; god is a fish.
@indonesia-phil saidThe only question remaining, therefore, is whether or not one believes in cod.
That which we must conclude from this clear and unambiguous writing is quite clear; god is a fish.
@indonesia-phil saidNo sir.
The only question remaining, therefore, is whether or not one believes in cod.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAm I herring you right?
No sir.
In the great scheme of things, I know my plaice.
😴
@indonesia-phil saidSorry sir, speak later.
Am I herring you right?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt's terrible, but the worse the better, so yeah, works for me. Perhaps we should not so denigrate Christ, flounder of the Christian church.
Sorry sir, speak later.
I have a bit of a haddock. (Does that work? )
Here we have an excerpt from Witness Lee's commentary on the story of Jesus feeding the crowd of 5,000 with the fish and 5 loaves (Matthew 14:14-21)
"...these five loaves were barley loaves. Barley is a type of the resurrected Christ (Leviticus 23:10). Thus, the barley loaves signify Christ in resurrection as food to us. Loaves are of the vegetable life, signifying the generating aspect of Christ's life, whereas fish are of the animal life, signifying the redeeming aspect of Christ's life."
(The Recovery Version: Footnotes of Matthew).
Someone put this thread, and sonship, out of their misery.