Originally posted by stellspalfiedude, once again, it not about me, i would be pleased if you left me out of it, third time asking.
ooookay, defensive about your age. if you are over the age of 40, its a very good idea to get your prostrate checked as prostrate cancer is a big risk. if you are over 40 your doctor should be doing this every so often. ill let you guess how they check. if you are over 40 i would suggest you ask your doc to do it.
on the topic of the anus and doctor ...[text shortened]... ing child birth.
on the topic of the anus and doctors, would you refuse to use suppositories?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut it is you who is alluding to what you "want" and don't "want" sexually. It is you who has made it about you. Just as you did with the fact that you personally don't "want" to give or receive oral sex [on a thread a few weeks ago].
this debate is not about me, why you cannot grasp that, i have no idea.
Originally posted by FMFits about the risks associated with inserting hands implements into the anus, its quite clear, what relevance other risky practices have to this is not readily discernible.
So if it's not about "risky practices", on what grounds are you questioning the sanity of homosexuals?
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou didn't answer my question and I didn't put words into your mouth.
you have continually put words in my mouth, but its not about me, so i will ignore them for the time being, its physiologically not normal, the anus is a one way system, references to kissing or anything else do not negate the fact.
You can safely insert something into a bottom, and you can safely kiss someone on the lips.
Both functions are sometimes unecessary, and both use parts of the body for purposes other than their primary biological one. They both give pleasure to some people.
So why draw a line with one and not the other?
Originally posted by FMFstrike three and you are out!
But it is you who is alluding to what you "want" and don't "want" sexually. It is you who has made it about you. Just as you did with the fact that you personally don't "want" to give or receive oral sex [on a thread a few weeks ago].
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobieare you still saying its not 'normal' for a doctor to insert a finger in your bum?
no i acknowledge my mistake, i have not acknowledged that its normal.
how do you feel about cystoscopy and bladder scope exams that insert tubes through your willy, is that normal?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHumans take risks. Always have done, always will. It's natural. I don't see how you can credibly argue that risk taking can be equated with insanity? You have not made the case. We know you personally don't "want" anal sex or oral sex, but you have not made the case that anal sex is an issue of sanity.
its about the risks associated with inserting hands implements into the anus, its quite clear, what relevance other risky practices have to this is not readily discernible.
Originally posted by stellspalfieThread 142845
how old are you?
Vishy Anand was born on 11th December 1969 - he's 43.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHere's what you said: "Why would any normal functioning and sane individual want to do that?" So we get it it, you personally don't "want" anal sex. Why are you making it about what you "want" and don't 'want"?
strike three and you are out!
2 edits
Originally posted by Rank outsideryes you did attempt to put words in my mouth,
You didn't answer my question and I didn't put words into your mouth.
You can safely insert something into a bottom, and you can safely kiss someone on the lips.
Both functions are sometimes unecessary, and both use parts of the body for purposes other than their primary biological one. They both give pleasure to some people.
So why draw a line with one and not the other?
So, occasional anal activity using a finger, carefully practised with lubricant to avoid these problems, is OK then?
and
So, are we clear now that the mere insertion of a part of the hand into the anus can be normal, natural and sane? Good.
both attempts to introduce assumptions, firstly you have assumed that i am OK with inserting lubricated fingers and secondly, that inserting the hand into the anus is normal, natural and sane, a statement i have not made. But anyway, these are irrelevancies.
because physiologically the anus is not designed to have hands, implements or anything else inserted into it under any circumstance. References to kissing, medical procedures, or anything else, cannot negate the physiology. Anything inserted is an abnormality, contrary to nature and if we are to take the Doctors research as truth, has been quite harmful for those who have practised it.
Can i ask you a question, you state that you are perfectly happy with a finger, what about three fingers, a whole hand? a forearm?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobieseems its not any of my business................but you are happy to post it on other threads. over 40!!!! robbie time to get the finger!!! actually you may only need one check-up if thats clear i think they leave you until you are in your 50's. one little finger wont hurt.
none of your business. Its against the terms of service to ask for personal details from other users, again, this debate is not about me, why you cannot grasp that, i have no idea.