Originally posted by FMFI thought you weren't trying to trip her up?
And yet you join self-identifying Christians like robbie, Suzianne, lemon lime, josephw and others when they call divegeester a "so-called Christian" or words to that effect.
And yet, like you, what he personally believes arguably matters - in his mind - only to him and his God figure and what he believes is according to his understanding, too.
It someti ...[text shortened]... ess to attack a fellow Christian ~ that you don't give him the same leeway as you give yourself.
Originally posted by divegeesterBut what if Purgatory is a place of teaching who Jesus was to those who never knew Jesus?
How do you account for:
Hebrews 9:27
“And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:”
I believe the teaching of purgatory to be error. Furthermore no one can expurgate their own sin.
Originally posted by divegeesterSo do you actually think it is okay to vilify those who merely disagree with you? You have a long history of arguing with those who have the temerity to disagree with you and to vilify them, attack them, and make up stories about them until others attack them too, all because they disagree with you. You have a far better relationship with atheists in this forum than you do with other Christians, some of whom believe in the eternal torture theory. I happen to think this philosophy of forum warfare against those who disagree with you to be far worse and more horrible than merely believing what is a fundamental doctrine of many Christian churches. "Hitlerizing" these people who disagree with you is far, far worse than just adopting a doctrine, no matter how horrible you believe the doctrine to be.
I disagree. What we believe affects our actions and therefore impacts what those around us see and believe.
The teaching of eternal suffering, which you seem to be comfortable if equivocal with, is probably the single most horrendous notion a human being could contour up. It puts Christ on an infinitely worse moral platform than religious terrorists and is totally against the natur of God as revealed in the rest of scripture.
Originally posted by divegeesterShe called you these things based on your forum behavior, not your Christian beliefs. Can you tell the difference anymore?
Page 193 of the Memo thread where you called me, among other things a "systematic torturer". Later in the thread you called me an "actual sadist".
Originally posted by divegeesterIs it? I thought it was more of your standard "forum-combat" behavior? Perhaps, if you feel it is a debate, then could you, you know, actually debate, and not attack her? And yes, same goes for FMF. As I said, you sound more like him every day. And no, that's not a compliment.
This is a debate Startreader. 🙂