- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
You bring concepts and language from a secondary source (Witness Lee) that are alien to scripture. Rajk doesn't do that.
Ah Witness, Witness Lee (died in 1997) . . .
I was wondering when you were going again to go for the "cult of personality" excuse again. Back to old tried and true diversions, huh?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 28795
@sonship saidWhat's the point in asking for an explaination if you're just going to bat it away?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
You bring concepts and language from a secondary source (Witness Lee) that are alien to scripture. Rajk doesn't do that.
I was wondering when you were going again to go for the "cult of personality" excuse again. Back to old tried and true diversions, huh?
Rajk refers to scripture. You refer to the Recovery Movement.
When has Rajk ever brought additional words to scripture like God-ized or We-ized?
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Rajk refers to scripture. You refer to the Recovery Movement.
You're wreckless still.
NO proof of 93% twisting of a passage as boasted.
And now, would you see if you can find a quote from me on this Forum referring to capital R and Capital M "Recovery Movement".
Go get it. Catch me having written "the Recovery Movement".
Out out here on a limb now.
I am careful with words and am pretty sure you can't find me having written that in that way.
Show me up and produce a quote.
The recovery - a Movement / movement. Where did I write that?
You refer to the Recovery Movement.
WHERE DID I WRITE THAT ????
08 Feb 22
@sonship saidAre you saying that you never referred to the recovery movement, or the need to have your own version and rewriting the bible which is significantly from the KJV?
@Ghost-of-a-DukeRajk refers to scripture. You refer to the Recovery Movement.
You're wreckless still.
NO proof of 93% twisting of a passage as boasted.
And now, would you see if you can find a quote from me on this Forum referring to capital R and Capital M "Recovery Movement".
Go get it. Catcm me having written [b] "the Recov ...[text shortened]...
The recovery - a Movement / movement. Where did I write that?
WHERE DID I WRITE THAT ????
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
08 Feb 22
@Rajk999
Yep.
Now. If you want to help go encourage one of your atheist / agnostic - skepto - free heads to explain to me what you mean by
the goats with jutrification of life to all men as a gift are cursed anyway and sent to the eternal punishment reserved for the devil and his angels.
FMF got cold feet at the last minute.
Go see if moonbus, Ghost, avalanch, Divegeester, or somebody can tell what that meant to them.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Okay. folks. I may have said "the Lord's recovery" was a move of God or a move of the Holy Spirit.
THAT I may have written.
And I also may have indicated that what happened with Martin Luther and Justification by faith was a part of "the Lord's recovery" - a move of the Spirit of God.
And I may have written that God is still moving.
I think I wrote that He is moving ON. He is moving ON!
"The Recovery Movement?" No. Some of you under estimate the care with which I choose my words. Albeit, I do make too many typos often.
08 Feb 22
@sonship saidWhy would I want to do that?
@Rajk999
Yep.
Now. If you want to help go encourage one of your atheist / agnostic - skepto - free heads to explain to me what you mean by
the goats with jutrification of life to all men as a gift are cursed anyway and sent to the eternal punishment reserved for the devil and his angels.
FMF got cold feet at the last minute.
Go see if moonbus, Ghost, avalanch, Divegeester, or somebody can tell what that meant to them.
Do you ever see me starting stupid threads like this?
Ever see me harassing others to explain what you say?
Ever see me begging for attention like an insecure needy child?
If your teachings were truly of Christ then you would need to do none of those things
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
I told you ~ not interested - point-blank, immediately.
Yea, well you said you undoubtedly could explain him.
And I think you cannot.
But you asked me what is wrong with the paragraph.
If you can explain what he seems to be saying, I'll explain what I think is wrong.
But you're not going to do that.
So wait until some atheist who gets it breaks it down to me.
As for "preening?"
You preen yourself not for beauty but for UGLINESS - judging from that terrible photo I like to vomit when I see and have to look at.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 28795
08 Feb 22
@sonship saidYou refer to the Recovery Movement for your deification nonsense and seek to supplant it into scripture.
@Ghost-of-a-DukeRajk refers to scripture. You refer to the Recovery Movement.
You're wreckless still.
NO proof of 93% twisting of a passage as boasted.
And now, would you see if you can find a quote from me on this Forum referring to capital R and Capital M "Recovery Movement".
Go get it. Catch me having written [b] "the Recov ...[text shortened]... that?
You refer to the Recovery Movement.
WHERE DID I WRITE THAT ????
You need to stop doing that.