Rajk999 I accept more BECAUSE ....

Rajk999 I accept more BECAUSE ....

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
250969
07 Feb 22
1 edit

@sonship said
@Ghost-of-a-Duke

Nevertheless, your aim of taking a swipe at Rajk backfired in spectacular fashion.


Preytell?

And . . . if things were to go 100% as I wanted them to go, how would it have turned out ?


( And PLEASE everyone, vote with your thumb )
I would be interested in hearing your response to that ... that this thread is to take a swipe at me...
What doctrine of Christ that I promoted makes you want to take a swipe at me. What makes our doctrines so incompatible?

I reciall that this is not the first thread you started designed to condemn me.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
07 Feb 22
2 edits

@Rajk999


I was not interested in taking a swipe at you.

I was interested in why SO MANY swipe compulsively at me and some other Christians here as oppose to swipe at you.

How many tit for tate snarks from atheists follow almost all of your posts?
Seems much less. And I am asking the prime swipers WHY.

And I am not disappointed at the responses that have come, which most of which I take at face value.

Did Ghost ever tell you that your thread backfired on you . . . ha ha ha?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
25 Nov 21
Moves
1990
07 Feb 22

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Nevertheless, your aim of taking a swipe at Rajk backfired in spectacular fashion.
You think atheists agreeing with rajk999 is a victory for who or what?

Given rajk999’s doctrine, it doesn’t surprise me at all. He and atheists have a lot in common, which is hardly an endorsement of Christianity.

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
250969
07 Feb 22

@sonship said

Did Ghost ever tell you that your thread backfired on you . . . ha ha ha?
No, maybe because my threads do not backfire.

A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
07 Feb 22

@rajk999 said
No, maybe because my threads do not backfire.
They don't frontfire either.

A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
07 Feb 22

@rajk999 said
I sincerely hope we get the opportunity to socialise in person one good day FMF. What is amazing is that I have to argue with professed Christians about what Jesus said, after which they claim that I am the one that does not believe in Jesus Christ.,
Lick FMF's hand well enough and maybe he'll grant you an audience.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
25 Nov 21
Moves
1990
07 Feb 22

@rajk999 said
No, maybe because my threads do not backfire.
That’s only ‘cause you ignore obvious criticisms and pointed questions about your doctrine.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
07 Feb 22
2 edits

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
07 Feb 22
1 edit

@sonship said
This is a typical post written by old timer here Rajk999.
[quote]There is One God, and One mediator, Jesus Christ. God so loved the world [not Jews or Christians only], that he gave his Son Jesus to die so that .. by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. (Romans 5:18 KJV) [all men - regardless of religion], so that whosoever be ...[text shortened]... , BigDogg, FMF, to name a few.

I do not argue as much with Rajk999 because . . . . .
A point in his favor: he focuses on things that make practical sense in the real world, like giving to the poor, and caring for the sick.

A point against: he condones slavery. I have taken him to task over this several times.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
07 Feb 22
1 edit

@BigDogg


A point against: he condones slavery. I have taken him to task over this several times.


Sounds like you believe in an ultimate justice and real human dignity.

Can you just tell me where is your ultimate source for these two things ?
I mean the final decision on the reality of these two things in the universe is who?

You?
Them?
Which them?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
08 Feb 22

@sonship said
I think my perception is not too far off.

That more vocal atheists here reason - "If I have to have someone here tell me about Jesus, I prefer it be Rajk999 to say, PB1022, KellyJay, sonship, josephw"
What a peculiar thing to say.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
08 Feb 22
2 edits

@FMF

For fuzziness and shifty obscurity your answer was the most so.

Way back when, Rajk999 made it crystal clear to me that he's not here to discuss atheism or theism with atheists. Fair enough. He's stuck to that, and I respect him for that choice and for his constancy.

There are only a few posters here I'd quite like to have a beer and bite to eat with one day, and Rajk999 is one of them.

I've always thought his theology - though I don't subscribe to it - is clear and tenaciously argued.

It's been fascinating, down through the years, to see the number of informal fallacies his fellow followers of Jesus, a motley lot for sure, have resorted to and brandished in their efforts to assail his cogent and brusquely delivered interpretations.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
08 Feb 22

Os this the most important part?

I've always thought his theology - though I don't subscribe to it - is clear and tenaciously argued.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
08 Feb 22

@sonship said
For fuzziness and shifty obscurity your answer was the most so.
There is no "fuzziness" or "shifty obscurity" in anything I have said. You sound like you are trying to hurt my feelings, sonship. It's so mean of you.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
08 Feb 22

@sonship said
Os this the most important part?

I've always thought his theology - though I don't subscribe to it - is clear and tenaciously argued.
Important to whom? You?