Permanent Members of Christ's Royal Family

-Removed-

So you reckon Grampy Bobby is "completely wrong" when he tells me that I am a permanent member of "Christ's Royal Family" despite the fact that I am an "unbeliever"?

-Removed-

You worded this carefully:

"I completely take your word for it that you believe you were once a Christian and you now believe you are not."

So my question is point blank and a response to your deliberate wording.

You take me at my word that I believe I am not a Christian

Does this suggest you believe I might still be a Christian, despite what I believe about myself?

-Removed-

Who are these "Permanent Members of Christ's Royal Family"?

-Removed-

There is no "offence", just fascination. If I am an "unbeliever" now, do you ~ like Kelly Jay ~ think that I was therefore never a "believer"? Kelly has sought to cancel out almost three decades of being a Christian with stuff about me "lying" and "faking it". This is an attempt at "superimposing" surely?

-Removed-

How is it you think I might only "believe" that I am not a Christian when I clearly do not subscribe to any of the claims that Christians make about Christ? Isn't subscribing to these beliefs a prerequisite for being a Christian?

-Removed-

Rajk999 aside, none of the Christians want to chase him down ~ and I don't suppose he would engage them genuinely even if they did. Instead some of the Christians want to talk about whether I am a still a Christian or never was a Christian etc. etc. It's very interesting. 🙂

-Removed-

You, however, think I might still be a Christian regardless of what I have revealed about myself, right? That was what your careful wording in that earlier post meant, yes?