Originally posted by FMFSo how does everything you have said answer my question as to why you believe deception is immoral?
As I said, I am not pretending anything. I have explained in detail to you - and in public here many times - the reasons for my views on what is morally sound and what is morally unsound ~ as they pertain to deception, damage and coercion.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkYou'll just have to keep looking for moments - like the 4th September - when I didn't say something or other - until you come across a moment when I did - and then you'll know.
So how does everything you have said answer my question as to why you believe deception is immoral?
Originally posted by FMFWhen exactly did I claim to be 'psychologically abused'? Is this another occasion whereby you see fit to lie? It seems you can't help yourself.
When you were psychologically abused - as you'd have me believe - for 24 years in the cult you claim you were in, did people talk to you using the same rhetorical tricks and ticks that you use here when you purport to be discussing things and asking people questions?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkWell, if that bog standard I-could-have-written-it description you gave of your 24 years of life in a cult was not a description of treatment that amounted to psychological abuse, then just say so.
When exactly did I claim to be 'psychologically abused'? Is this another occasion whereby you see fit to lie? It seems you can't help yourself.
Originally posted by FMFWhat exactly did I say that gave you the impression that I was psychologically abused?
Well, if that bog standard I-could-have-written-it description you gave of your 24 years of life in a cult was not a description of treatment that amounted to psychological abuse, then just say so.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkYou gave me the impression that you were psychologically abused with your description of how you were treated and how you managed to escape from it. Perhaps you copy pasted it from a web site and do not remember its content?
What exactly did I say that gave you the impression that I was psychologically abused?
If you now say your treatment at the hands of your family and the cult did not amount to psychological abuse, then I will take your word for it. But you should bear in mind that when you apologized for your strange behaviour towards me (an apology which you seemed to retract or forget later) you also tried to explain your peculiar and unpleasant interpersonal behaviour by saying something along the lines of 'you can take a person out of the cult, but you can't always take the cult out of a person.'
Your description of how you were treated as a child and as a youth, that sudden apology, your attribution of your troll-like behaviour to your cult past, and your change of mind about your apology and your seemingly retracted undertaking to stop with the lumbering piss-take act, all appeared to point towards psychological abuse; I thought you'd acknowledged it and blamed it. If I've got the wrong end of the stick, just say so.
Originally posted by FMFSo you've generated an argument for why and when it is not immoral to lie?
Do you have any comment on the ideas I offered about when lying is arguably not immoral?
Is that possible? Sounds like a strangely self-indulgent manipulation of morality to justify one's excuses for not telling the truth.
Originally posted by FMFAnd all of this is a red herring to deflect from the fact that you haven't told my why you believe deception is morally unsound in some cases and not in other cases.
You gave me the impression that you were psychologically abused with your description of how you were treated and how you managed to escape from it. Perhaps you copy pasted it from a web site and do not remember its content?
If you now say your treatment at the hands of your family and the cult did not amount to psychological abuse, then I will take your wor ...[text shortened]... hought you'd acknowledged it and blamed it. If I've got the wrong end of the stick, just say so.