- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
@divegeester saidThe reason I ignore your post is that to answer it IMPLIES that a wrongful act of some kind has been done by me here.
Why won’t you state before the Lord Jesus Christ that you HAD previously heard of the phrase “the organism of the triune God” ?
You’re lying about it aren’t you...
Frankly it baffles me a bit.
Someone brings up "organism of the Triune God". I do not address the post immediately. I do other things. Finally I speak to the phrase.
And this appears as evasion, hiding, dishonesty.
I am then pressed "Admit that you knew about this phrase. Admit it. Admit it!!"
Where did I deny it?
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
The line of inquisition is itself ridiculous. There is absolutely no reason I should retract, re-phrase, re-state, re-think, modify, correct, or otherwise have second thought somehow about what I said.
I FIRST HEARD THE PHRASE IN 1974.
Produce please, the POST written by me that indicates this statement is a contradiction of ANYTHING I previously wrote in this discussion.
And further, I would not be at all surprised if in the archives or posts of previous years I may well have mentioned the phrase. I've been repeating things here for a long time.
It is PURELY in the imagination of some eager fault finders here that I contradicted myself in some way about the phrase "organism of the Triune God".
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Crickets,
Crickets chirping in the moonlight, rather than the posts of atheists and deists answering me about a suppose contradiction I made on the thread Deification of Man.
The lotus flower withers as it awaits a reply from Dive, Ghost, or FMF.
- son ship
@sonship saidYou had no idea what I was talking about when I attributed organism of the triune God to Witness Lee. Later you claimed you had heard it 30 years ago in Boston. That was a clear lie sonship. That is the 'wrongful act' in the equation. Do the math.
The reason I ignore your post is that to answer it IMPLIES that a wrongful act of some kind has been done by me here.
Frankly it baffles me a bit.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
It was not a lie. It wasn't even sneaky!
You're reading into circumstances things which are simply not there.
GIVE IT UP already.
And if that is all you have to be concerned about in this subject, I'm clearly doing better then I originally estimated.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
'…In this way the believers become the reproduction, expansion, and physical continuation of the incarnate and incorporate Son of God and indeed the organism of the Triune God Himself.'
Witness Lee
Was this the first time you mentioned "the organism of the triune God" in this thread ?
@sonship saidClearly you don't take lying seriously. (Clumsy lying at that).
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
It was not a lie. It wasn't even sneaky!
You're reading into circumstances things which are simply not there.
GIVE IT UP already.
And if that is all you have to be concerned about in this subject, I'm clearly doing better then I originally estimated.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Bumped question for you Ghost.
'…In this way the believers become the reproduction, expansion, and physical continuation of the incarnate and incorporate Son of God and indeed the organism of the Triune God Himself.'
Witness Lee
Was this the first time you mentioned "the organism of the Triune God Himself" in this thread ?