Site Ideas
04 Dec 08
Originally posted by no1marauderThen it would have been gone on your post, and I wouldnt have had to say anything...LOL... 😛
Would that post rate as a "personal attack" if you and RN got your way as regards standards of Forum moderation at RHP?
But as usual you are taking it to the extreme, very typical, and nothing less from you would be expected. 🙂
If you did it over and over again, with the crybaby crap, it could be considered a personal attack...Like if I were to call you a crybaby everytime I chatted with you. How would you take that personally?
Originally posted by Very RustyMy second post on this page would have been removable under the standard of moderation you favor here at RHP?
Then it would have been gone on your post, and I wouldnt have had to say anything...LOL... 😛
But as usual you are taking it to the extreme, very typical, and nothing less from you would be expected. 🙂
Originally posted by Red NightTOS - Paragraph 6
I already made this point.
Both threads are personal attacks.
If the person being attacked was offended, they both should be taken down.
You understand that by using the Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable.
Why should the lowest level of hypersensitive crybabies be allowed to dictate to the majority of users what can be posted in the Forums?
Originally posted by no1marauderDon't be silly. IF you are actually a lawyer you know that is in there to cover the Site owners!
TOS - Paragraph 6
You understand that by using the Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable.
Why should the lowest level of hypersensitive crybabies be allowed to dictate to the majority of users what can be posted in the Forums?
Why do you think offensive, indecent and objectionable material is removed from threads?
Originally posted by Very RustyExactly; they have no obligation to shield hypersensitive crybabies from having their tender feelings hurt. That's what you agreed to, so suck it up, Shirley.
Don't be silly. IF you are actually a lawyer you know that is in there to cover the Site owners!
Why do you think offensive, indecent and objectionable material is removed from threads?
Originally posted by no1marauderLOL@ the little man calling a grown up man Shirley on the Interwebz!!
Exactly; they have no obligation to shield hypersensitive crybabies from having their tender feelings hurt. That's what you agreed to, so suck it up, Shirley.
Does it make you feel like a big man? It sure makes you look pretty small, but hey don't stop there, dig a deeper hole for yourself, and show your true colors, perhaps someone hasn't seen them yet. 😛 😉
Originally posted by Very RustyIs that the best "personal attack" you can come up with?
LOL@ the little man calling a grown up man Shirley on the Interwebz!!
Does it make you feel like a big man? It sure makes you look pretty small, but hey don't stop there, dig a deeper hole for yourself, and show your true colors, perhaps someone hasn't seen them yet. 😛 😉
Originally posted by no1marauderOh by the way, last I heard, you weren't deciding anything! 😛
TOS - Paragraph 6
You understand that by using the Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable.
Why should the lowest level of hypersensitive crybabies be allowed to dictate to the majority of users what can be posted in the Forums?
So we are quite safe there. 😉
Originally posted by no1marauderYou were the one with the try at a "personal insult" by calling me Shirley, but I just take it where it is coming from. You are just a very rude individual, and that is why you will never be a mod on this site!
Is that the best "personal attack" you can come up with?
You have no idea where the line is! 😛
OK, I am off to make some chess moves, Have a great evening, week, month, and life!