Censorship is a threat to science

@metal-brain said
The Integrity of Science Is At Stake

Censorship of science is deeply troubling on many levels. At the most basic, it affronts the fundamental premises of the scientific method. Science is not static. It constantly questions, borrows from, builds on, and adds to existing knowledge. Its basic tools include formulating and testing hypotheses, documentation and replicat ...[text shortened]... ittingly helping to return society to the dark ages.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DAU74ByibIYd/

The name "Robert Malone" has more that 64 million results on google. He goes on FoxNews regularly. He was just a guest on the most popular podcast in the world.

How, exactly, is he being censored?

Am I being censored since I don't get to go on Joe Rogan's podcast but Robert Malone does?

@wildgrass said
The name "Robert Malone" has more that 64 million results on google. He goes on FoxNews regularly. He was just a guest on the most popular podcast in the world.

How, exactly, is he being censored?

Am I being censored since I don't get to go on Joe Rogan's podcast but Robert Malone does?

https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/big-tech-censorship-twitter-permanently-suspends-mrna-inventor-dr-robert-malone/

I was under the impression that Robert Malone invented the Mrna technique, and has recently found himself being taken down becasue he is questioning the way that it is being used?

Seems to have echoes of Kary Mullis who invented the RT_PCR test (Noble Prize) and told the world that you cant use it in epidemic situations.

@filthyherman said
I was under the impression that Robert Malone invented the Mrna technique, and has recently found himself being taken down becasue he is questioning the way that it is being used?

Seems to have echoes of Kary Mullis who invented the RT_PCR test (Noble Prize) and told the world that you cant use it in epidemic situations.

Yes, Mullis once said his PCR tests should not be used for what they have been used for. He also said Fauci doesn't know much about anything and that he would say it to his face. Mullis is a good example of someone that thought science was being corrupted.

Mullis was quoted saying "the never-ending quest for more grants and staying with established dogmas" has hurt science. He believed that "science is being practiced by people who are dependent on being paid for what they are going to find out," not for what they actually produce.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
No, I won't play that game, since you have no interest in answering the charge or the question. You know EXACTLY what I am saying and you are just going diversionary.

You could care less about censorship, what you REALLY mean is folks with real science in their background refuse to accept the spam bait sites you THINK is supporting your position so any REAL ...[text shortened]... led sites go, the more you THINK their level of BS will somehow win you converts.
Hint: IT DOESN"T.

Seems to me, if someone has
a valid story to post, he would
want to add credibility to any
statement made (in the post).
Using Bitchute, as a source,
isn't the way to add credibility,
in fact, it takes away any value
that the post may actually have.

@jimm619 said
Seems to me, if someone has
a valid story to post, he would
want to add credibility to any
statement made (in the post).
Using Bitchute, as a source,
isn't the way to add credibility,
in fact, it takes away any value
that the post may actually have.

"Using Bitchute, as a source,
isn't the way to add credibility"

Bitchute is not a source you retard.
Is youtube a source?

Is your phone a source?
You don't even know what a source is.

Jimmi thinks only the video services that censor content are credible. By that logic the Nazis were very credible. Jimmi logic.

@Metal-Brain
Hey Comrade, spin it any way you want, you are still a TRAITOR to the US and I would say that to your pasty white face if I saw you.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Hey Comrade, spin it any way you want, you are still a TRAITOR to the US and I would say that to your pasty white face if I saw you.

Stop trolling lies.

“Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness,” wrote Richard Horton, the Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet in 2015.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext

@Metal-Brain
And OF COURSE you would post such things since what you really want is the destruction of science so your political agenda would have no competition. Then YOU would start the rewrite of history which you have already begun, but of course the problem there is you are a dolt intellectually and don't have the skills to complete your self designated task.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
And OF COURSE you would post such things since what you really want is the destruction of science so your political agenda would have no competition. Then YOU would start the rewrite of history which you have already begun, but of course the problem there is you are a dolt intellectually and don't have the skills to complete your self designated task.

Science has already been compromised.
You are condoning it's destruction because of your political bias.

Your psychological projection is over the top again.

@metal-brain said
The Integrity of Science Is At Stake

Censorship of science is deeply troubling on many levels. At the most basic, it affronts the fundamental premises of the scientific method. Science is not static. It constantly questions, borrows from, builds on, and adds to existing knowledge. Its basic tools include formulating and testing hypotheses, documentation and replicat ...[text shortened]... ittingly helping to return society to the dark ages.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DAU74ByibIYd/

Weeding out misinformation is precisely what science does.

Ever hear of the Scientific Method?

Crank ideas are eventually discarded in favor of reality.

@suzianne said
Weeding out misinformation is precisely what science does.

Ever hear of the Scientific Method?

Crank ideas are eventually discarded in favor of reality.

"Crank ideas are eventually discarded in favor of reality."

Eventually perhaps, but how long does it take?
Did Lysenkoism get caught in time?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

What about Fauciism? Did that get caught in time?
How about climate change misinformation? Was it caught in time to prevent this?

https://thepostmillennial.com/climate-activist-dies-after-setting-himself-on-fire-outside-supreme-court

Science misinformation is killing people.

I must admit, I have not read much of this thread, but I must say this:

Censorship has ALWAYS been a threat to science. Example, much of Copernicus' work wasn't published until after his death for fear of retribution. Galileo could have done so much more work, but the "Church" tied him up in hearing after hearing.

Censorship is the main culprit that created the DARK AGE, in which very little scientific advancement was accomplished.

This is not a newsflash. We could just as easily start a thread titled, "Drinking poison kills people."

@liljo said
Galileo could have done so much more work, but the "Church" tied him up in hearing after hearing.

Sorry, but this is a myth. So is the existence of any "dark age". The only place where there was anything like that is Great Britain. Not even the British Isles - Ireland did just fine - just Great Britain. In places like the Frankish Empire, churchmen were one of the driving forces behind the further development of science and culture.

As for Galileo, his major problem wasn't that he was right and the church was not, his problem was that he couldn't prove that he was right because his data was iffy. The church's scientists basically said: "Look, we suspect you may be right, but give us some time to gather more reliable data on this so we can justify it to the cardinals and the common citizen" and Galileo's reaction was, more or less, to say "No, I'm right, you're wrong, and the pope is a slobbering idiot" and in general be a complete d@^& about it.