Originally posted by no1marauder
As long as the site is more interested in punishing those who call attention to obvious evidence of cheating rather than the cheaters themselves the do nothing "systems" devised to divert legitimate criticism of the failed policies undertaken will continue to be treated as the bad jokes they are.
or perhaps these systems are in place to stop players from accusing non-cheaters.
Any idea of broadcasting unprofessional and biased evidence in a open source setting
is at best, ludicrous. Cheating is certainly a problem, and it certainly needs a
solution. The solution however, is not to allow random players to protest openly
against other players.
The fair ticket system is built with anonymity in mind. Should a cheater be
discovered through the correct, and fair, use of the system, then that player will be
banned. At that time, the violation becomes clear.
Decribing the value of someones play is one thing (which thankfully this thread
continues to do), its the accusation of using outside parties to enhance your play,
which clearly violates each players freedom.
Why pay money to play somehwere, when a slew of non-subscribing players can/could
accuse you of foul play, over, and over, and over again?
I think the system has been built with more in mind.
-GIN