what hapened to the 1400 guy who beat 2400 player

what hapened to the 1400 guy who beat 2400 player

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

c
Grammar Nazi

Auschwitz

Joined
03 Apr 06
Moves
44348
31 Dec 09

So you spend your time on here reading through threads long dead, trying to find out about other users?

Yikes...I hope you aren't stalking me!

r

Joined
24 Jun 08
Moves
50
31 Dec 09

Originally posted by Nowakowski
Archived data.

Or maybe I am cludi? - 🙄

What a maddening problem.
Maybe I know about nmdavid too.... yikes...


What about Arrakis? thats pre-me.

There are lots and lots of things I know from much much before I was here..
🙂

Take Korch's tag before it was Korch... the beloved Korch, a 3(c) violator...oh dear
But, not as bad as lollette changing to emashi? She's not even indian... goodness
nice graph

i

Joined
26 Jun 06
Moves
59283
31 Dec 09

everyone has the right to be paranoid after a single game, due to the fact the engine team has the skills of Rob Schnieder or Stephen Baldwin 🙂

this post will be destroyed in 10, 9, 8...

c

Joined
02 Jan 07
Moves
38596
31 Dec 09

Some would actually question the existence of a Engine team

i

Joined
26 Jun 06
Moves
59283
31 Dec 09

Originally posted by chessisagame
Some would actually question the existence of a Engine team
agreed. I would be willing to join such a team if it existed and try to help this site out.. In fact, I was in a vote to be on the team a while back and lost to an engine user if I recall correctly.

pp

Joined
30 May 09
Moves
0
31 Dec 09

Originally posted by chessisagame
Personally Im kinda surprised the forums arent members only..... especially with all the mud the non-subs throw around.
That's non-sense. There are lots of nons-subscribers who contribute a lot to the forums. I don't understand how people can fail to see being an idiot on the forum is not about subscription.

pp

Joined
30 May 09
Moves
0
31 Dec 09

Originally posted by chessisagame
Look at Fat Lady.... hasnt played on the site for 6 months and has the nerve to comment on someone else's game! 🙂
Another post that is utter non-sense. Is there a least number of games played in the last 6 months limit to comment on "someone else's game"?

c

Joined
02 Jan 07
Moves
38596
31 Dec 09

Originally posted by philidor position
Another post that is utter non-sense. Is there a least number of games played in the last 6 months limit to comment on "someone else's game"?
You missed both points completely! Personally, I think non-subs should be barred from Forums, I fail to see anything positive they contribute, except for cheating accusations!

C

Joined
14 May 09
Moves
974
31 Dec 09

I don't know what happened or what thread was pulled but a couple of months back there was the ridiculous situation of people playing like complete noobs then in 3 or so months (not even a year as the norm for these improver's) playing at 2000-2400 level.

Apparently even discussing the very idea of noobs "miraculous improvement" would get threads deleted. However as the case was then (I don't know how it is in the present) people who played like engines were still playing on the site. Is this still the case?

C

Joined
14 May 09
Moves
974
31 Dec 09

Originally posted by chessisagame
Look at Fat Lady.... hasnt played on the site for 6 months and has the nerve to comment on someone else's game! 🙂
I can't answer for Fat Lady but maybe there could be engine users on the site and he doesn't want to put his sweat into playing a box.

D

Joined
15 Apr 08
Moves
30159
31 Dec 09

Sincerely I wonder why people with nothing better to do are allowed to post in the forum, or how this thread is linked to chess in any way? You actually think that by throwing accusations of cheating at me I will leave the site or something? The first morons to try and discredit my work have been GeoffreyH and Atticus, bunch of sore losers. Funny how I never see any complaining from Tebb, Capa Preta, Caesare, JanKrb or other top players.
It seems a very bad idea to start taking this site seriously and putting hours of work into chess, but frankly it has helped me a lot OTB, so I should really not be taking any S-H-I-T from people who will never evolve.
I remember the accusations being tossed around about Weyerstrass being a blatant cheat, and what a shame it is that he's allowed to play here. I remember the same sad gang of ignorant hyenas throwing these accusations around, the result being your own pathetic discrediting. This is just a site for improving chess, nothing more. No money involved in winning, no FIDE rating either, nothing. How I play and how much time I put into games is my own business, you focus on getting a life and stop jerking off 😉

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
31 Dec 09
1 edit

Originally posted by DanVM
Sincerely I wonder why people with nothing better to do are allowed to post in the forum, or how this thread is linked to chess in any way? You actually think that by throwing accusations of cheating at me I will leave the site or something? The first morons to try and discredit my work have been GeoffreyH and Atticus, bunch of sore losers. Funny how I never s h time I put into games is my own business, you focus on getting a life and stop jerking off 😉
actually DanVM, this thread and the other thread was about a very rare phenomena, a player rated 1400 winning against a player rated 2400. That it has descended into the usual accusations is a truly sorry affair. :'(

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
31 Dec 09

Originally posted by Nowakowski
What? - Thats ill-formed logic.

Just because it happened that way, doesn't provide any evidence it wouldn't have
happened in the same way without said factor.


If I catch a fish, and call it a fish, then throw it back, will it live its whole life a fish?
The fact is, I could have left him alone and he was still a fish. Little change was made. ...[text shortened]... tive possibility greatly rises. This reporting can take
place without any "mob".

-GIN
Report to who? There weren't any Game Mods until there was an uproar in the Forums. Then a Game Mod was a cheat and would have remained a Game Mod without public accusations.

The fact of the matter is that the owners of this site have little incentive to ban cheaters unless there is a public outcry that they do so.

E

Joined
22 Oct 09
Moves
6289
31 Dec 09

Noobs will always jump to conclusions about other players. People with weak personality and no character will always join the band-wagon to wrongfully attack the ones that actually put an effort into something. It's only to compensate their own low self-esteem and sense of unworthiness. Pay no attention to them DanVM, the world is full of scum.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
31 Dec 09

Originally posted by DanVM
Sincerely I wonder why people with nothing better to do are allowed to post in the forum, or how this thread is linked to chess in any way? You actually think that by throwing accusations of cheating at me I will leave the site or something? The first morons to try and discredit my work have been GeoffreyH and Atticus, bunch of sore losers. Funny how I never s ...[text shortened]... h time I put into games is my own business, you focus on getting a life and stop jerking off 😉
Maybe you're right; you've certainly improved from your first game on this site in April 2008 when you dropped your Queen on move 10 and your second game where you as White got checkmated on move 16.Game 4879620 Game 4875406