03 Dec 08
Originally posted by SuzianneSorry, I don't know what "hypocitical" means.
Hypocitical? I guess you should know.
GB's threads are rarely insults at all, veiled or not. And unlike your self-serving threads, his are more often than not self-deprecating.
As for his threads not being insults, I'll invite you to read Thread 104361, especially concentrating on GB's and your posts of the first 2 pages.
It must be fairly stressful being the moral compass for us all, suzimanne, AND enlisting enrollees for the "I hate Ragnorak club".
D
03 Dec 08
Originally posted by Ragnorak1. Another good point.
Gratuitous thread? Show me another kind in the general forum.
Also, isn't it a bit hypocritical of you to be judging Crowley for starting a thread which takes the mick out of another member. Aren't all of your threads (and lets remember who starts the most gratuitous threads in General), veiled insults against the membership of the site.
D
2. Negative. Not judging Crowley (his personality or style) but did hope to draw his attention to a petty behavior pattern which is immoderate.
3. No, Sir, not at all. Many, many of my threads and posts since last Christmas were lead balloon failures right out of the caul in which they
were kept or gate. Yes, I do try to re-focus members I care about with subtlety sometimes which you are free to interpret as "veiled insults".
03 Dec 08
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby"those miscreants who would seek to promote
Yes, I do try to re-focus members I care about with subtlety sometimes which you are free to interpret as "veiled insults".
toxic concentrations of the shallow, tawdry, peculiarly ugly, tasteless and abbhorent or to standarize the cheap and the shoddy or to cause
dysfunctional frictions and unrest"
You later admit that you were talking about RHP members. I don't see how referring to somebody as toxic, ugly, tasteless and abbhorent without mentioning names could be described as anything other than a "veiled insult".
D
03 Dec 08
1 edit
Originally posted by CrowleyIn the words of Ozzy:
Hey InterWebZ nerds! Here's your chance!
Let the wise, unbiased and well-balanced Rusty give you guiding about HOW TO LIVE YOUR LIFE.[/i]
He is rough, tough and says it like he sees it.
Gems like this:
[i][b]People giving you funny looks on the street?
VR: Never happens to me! Perhaps grow some*, and walk to them and ask them why the hell ...[text shortened]... for a farming reference, except he forgot to mention what I should be growing! Spinach perhaps?[/b]
Mr. Crowley, what went on in your head
(Oh) Mr. Crowley, did you talk to the dead
Your lifestyle to me seemed so tragic
With the thrill of it all
You fooled all those people with magic
(Yeah)You waited on Satan's call
Mr. Charming, did you think you were pure
Mr. Alarming, in nocturnal rapport
Uncovering things that were sacred, manifest on this earth
(Oh)Conceived in the eye of a secret
Yeah, they scattered the afterbirth
Mr. Crowley, won't you ride my white horse?
Mr. Crowley, it's symbolic of course
Approaching a time that is classic
I hear that maidens call
Approaching a time that is drastic
Standing with their backs to the wall
Was it polemically sent?
I wanna know what you meant
I wanna know
I wanna know what you meant, yeah!
I'm curious, do you share your namesake's, Aliester Crowley's, penchant for not only chess and social criticism, but, painting, astrology, hedonism, bisexuality, and drug abuse? From what I understand, Crowley was an enthusiastic buggerer.
03 Dec 08
1 edit
Originally posted by RagnorakPleases me that you had the time/interest to read that thread. It contains facts. One doesn't mince words communicating with those he loves.
Sorry, I don't know what "hypocitical" means.
As for his threads not being insults, I'll invite you to read Thread 104361, especially concentrating on GB's and your posts of the first 2 pages.
It must be fairly stressful being the moral compass for us all, suzimanne, AND enlisting enrollees for the "I hate Ragnorak club".
D
Edit: "I hate Ragnoak club"... Doubt self pity deflection/sophomoric attention gambits really suit you. It's about issues, not you or me.
03 Dec 08
Originally posted by RagnorakYeah, and you can't read a typo and figure it out. Well that figures.
Sorry, I don't know what "hypocitical" means.
As for his threads not being insults, I'll invite you to read Thread 104361, especially concentrating on GB's and your posts of the first 2 pages.
It must be fairly stressful being the moral compass for us all, suzimanne, AND enlisting enrollees for the "I hate Ragnorak club".
D
Secondly, I wouldn't call calling someone a clown as a "veiled" insult. Seems pretty insulting to me, much like your own posts. The people he was calling out as clowns ARE clowns, so that's not much of an "insult" anyways.
So you cited one thread. One thread where the "insults" pale in comparison to the acts of those he rightfully called out as clowns.
One thread. Wow. Out of literally dozens of threads.
Sounds like I was right, "GB's threads are rarely insults at all, veiled or not." BTW, just so you know, the word "rarely" was not a typo, so you should have been able to understand it.
P.S. I didn't know you had a club, can I join? I don't enlist the enrollees... you do, just by being you.
03 Dec 08
Originally posted by SuzianneHAI GUY!
Yeah, and you can't read a typo and figure it out. Well that figures.
Secondly, I wouldn't call calling someone a clown as a "veiled" insult. Seems pretty insulting to me, much like your own posts. The people he was calling out as clowns ARE clowns, so that's not much of an "insult" anyways.
So you cited one thread. One thread where the "insults" ...[text shortened]... a club, can I join? I don't enlist the enrollees... you do, just by being you.
03 Dec 08
Originally posted by SuzianneWho are these clowns and how can Rusty help them?
The people he was calling out as clowns ARE clowns, so that's not much of an "insult" anyways.
Rusty has helped me immeasurably with my mod work from his VAST experience in Internet forum moderation.
He has shown me how to be TRULY unbiased.
03 Dec 08
Originally posted by RagnorakUnwrinkle your brilliant forehead. Let this perception through... looking at the nasty human condition in RHP microcosm, not specific individuals.
"those miscreants who would seek to promote
toxic concentrations of the shallow, tawdry, peculiarly ugly, tasteless and abbhorent or to standarize the cheap and the shoddy or to cause
dysfunctional frictions and unrest"
You later admit that you were talking about RHP members. I don't see how referring to somebody as toxic, ugly, tasteless and abbh ...[text shortened]... without mentioning names could be described as anything other than a "veiled insult".
D