@ghost-of-a-duke saidThen I can't imagine what you think of Dives posts, which usually are "ALL" below the belt. Nothing wrong with hitting below the belt in a street fight. Or in this case a keyboard warrior. We will have to agree to disagree on this one.
We are all 'real' chess players, irrespective of ability or rating. From memory, Dive put up a pretty good game when I played him, same goes for Rusty.
Criticising someone's chess game, on a chess site, is always below the belt.
@divegeester saidThat made absolutely no sense at all. Not even a little.
I think you’re just easily upset by things which go on here and that are outside of your control.
@divegeester saidNo that was appropriate because I was just simply answering his post. But I also said hitting below the belt is fine where it concerns chess. But I honestly did not mean for it to be nasty. And if that really bothered you then you really are a snowflake. I keep asking you to play two games with me. In fact 4 games. Two regular, and a different opening we can agree on.
Just now you said that I “wasn’t very bright”; would you classify that post by you are being “below the belt”?
We use to play. Bragging rights for one of us who are both bad at chess. lol
@vespin saidThis is your usual rhetoric when you are trying to self-justify your little jabs.
But I honestly did not mean for it to be nasty. And if that really bothered you then you really are a snowflake.
“Oh oh I don’t mean to be nasty … but if my little blow landed then your a snowflake”
Got back to the clans forum and shake your rattle in there.
351d
@divegeester saidOh, the outrageous irony.
I think you’re just easily upset by things which go on here and that are outside of your control.
351d
@divegeester saidA way of bowing out of a match you know you'll lose. 🙂
We didn’t “used to play”, we happened to have a few games years ago. But that was before I realised what toerag you were.
Not interested.
-VR