@AverageJoe1 saidNot wanting to play against someone who is playing within the rules is bad sportsmanship. Don't use government to change the rules just because one snowflake doesn't think she can win.
Easy one, wild grass. These rules, you speak of….. like marauder says if the rules depict in advance that men and women, then they should present the competition as such. It should be published at the outset. I can hardly sit here and say that should not be the case. It is America, have your competition. I would hope they would do that, and see how many women do not show ...[text shortened]... howed up. It was not presented this way a year ago when everyone was signing up for the competition.
@my-king-and-i removed their quoted postMarauder tries to say that since the queer loser, and i mean queer, was beaten, that it is OK for these quasi-men to compete against lithe women? What is he saying....what is he saying??
@my-king-and-i removed their quoted postThis marauder guy is using the final results of the competition to arrive at his conclusions. Queer, indeed,
Do you think that he/she will read this?
- Joined
- 20 Sep 01
- Moves
- 158778
The ONLY good thing about Trump is get rid of all the gender bull.
You were born with balls, you are a man
You were born with a vagina you are a woman
In the natural world - survival of the fittest; only the strong and fittest survive.
If all these fancy lbgtrvxyzsabc' s can't breed then eventually they will die out.
@my-king-and-i removed their quoted postif he does or does not only garbage people like you think it's a bad thing.
1 edit
@MartinS saidwhat a thorough and nuanced biology and/or sociology dissertation. i am convinced
The ONLY good thing about Trump is get rid of all the gender bull.
You were born with balls, you are a man
You were born with a vagina you are a woman
In the natural world - survival of the fittest; only the strong and fittest survive.
If all these fancy lbgtrvxyzsabc' s can't breed then eventually they will die out.
@AverageJoe1 saidoh, so you only have principles if you think you have the right audience?
This marauder guy is using the final results of the competition to arrive at his conclusions. Queer, indeed,
Do you think that he/she will read this?
@Zahlanzi saidThink about it, Z. The thought process, the decision at hand, to allow play or not allow play, occurs BEFORE they step into the ring, you see. So Marauder is saying that the fact that one of them wins or loses has a bearing on what decision was made prior to the bout? Whew. All of you are losing it.
oh, so you only have principles if you think you have the right audience?
Did you see where Suzanne says it is OK to burn Teslas when at the same time she has always harped about climate? EV‘s are made to help our climate, and she burns them up. And here, you support Marauder’s failure of logic. Whew.
@AverageJoe1 saidIdiot, YOU claimed that allowing transgender women to compete in these events was "ruining women's sports" because cisgender women had no chance against them. Cliff went so far as to claim they would have won every single women's Olympic event for the last 100 years if they had been entered.
This marauder guy is using the final results of the competition to arrive at his conclusions. Queer, indeed,
Do you think that he/she will read this?
So the actual results are relevant in debunking such ridiculous claims.
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@no1marauder saidOK not every single event, but certainly a great many, if not most of them.
Idiot, YOU claimed that allowing transgender women to compete in these events was "ruining women's sports" because cisgender women had no chance against them. Cliff went so far as to claim they would have won every single women's Olympic event for the last 100 years if they had been entered.
So the actual results are relevant in debunking such ridiculous claims.
Just like they are doing now.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidIn testimony to Congress last year, the head of the NCAA said there were no more than 10 transgender women competing in collegiate events.
OK not every single event, but certainly a great many, if not most of them.
Just like they are doing now.
That's out of over 200,000 women athletes.
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
1 edit
@no1marauder saidTell that to these high school girls I'm sure it will make them feel better:
In testimony to Congress last year, the head of the NCAA said there were no more than 10 transgender women competing in collegiate events.
That's out of over 200,000 women athletes.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidI don't watch YouTubes.
Tell that to these high school girls I'm sure it will make them feel better:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EEStiCGwY4
I'm sure there are a few sore losers getting a lot of play on right wing media. The fact is the participation of transgender women has a marginal effect on women's sports.
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@no1marauder saidThen you are burying your head in the sand and being willfully ignorant.
I don't watch YouTubes.
I'm sure there are a few sore losers getting a lot of play on right wing media. The fact is the participation of transgender women has a marginal effect on women's sports.
Just keep watching CNN/MSN and get the twisted media slant that makes you feel so smug and superior while ignoring what's really happening.