23 Oct '14 10:05>
Originally posted by shavixmirspot on bro
Surely an eternity burning in hell is preferable to 1 month of listening to Christians harp on about their crap?
Originally posted by FMFMaybe you're just taking it too seriously. Seems Bobby was only being creative. Why you feel the need to use negative buzz words to describe his post only goes to show how biased you are against anything Christian.
What I had in mind was the scoffing analogy with a Monopoly Game, the suggestion that divegeester's demonstrably genuine "interest" is "in jest", and the facetious mention of non-subscribers upgrading their RHP accounts with Monopoly money. It seemed to me to be an example of the "emotionalism" that Grampy Bobby claims to be against elsewhere. If it was not an attempted put down, maybe you can tell me what it was?
Originally posted by josephwI thought it was a pompous put down. If you thought it was creative, then good for you. I think it's just one of his devices to snuff out discussion or dissent and so insulate himself from having to engage sincerely.
Maybe you're just taking it too seriously. Seems Bobby was only being creative. Why you feel the need to use negative buzz words to describe his post only goes to show how biased you are against anything Christian.
Originally posted by josephwLook ~ on the Negative Volition thread ~ at the "negative buzz words" Grampy Bobby is trying to attach to people who disagree with him ~ look at the words he has thrown onto the table... negative ... detest ... self importance ... out of focus ... appear smarter than you are ... confused ... deflection ... distortion ... disruptive ... ideological ... misquotation ... personal attack ... online behaviours ... defensively ... offensively ... symptoms of emotionalism ... and you're here quibbling the use of the words "put down" to describe Grampy Bobby's attempt to give divegeester the flick [and dodge him] by describing his dissent as being "in jest"?
Why you feel the need to use negative buzz words ...
Originally posted by divegeesterHaving an emotional meltdown dive?
Most my posts to you, you ignore. Suddenly, now, I'm at your beck and call, is that it?
Originally posted by FMFYou use the same words as does everyone else.
Look ~ on the Negative Volition thread ~ at the "negative buzz words" Grampy Bobby is trying to attach to people who disagree with him ~ look at the words he has thrown onto the table... negative ... detest ... self importance ... out of focus ... appear smarter than you are ... confused ... deflection ... distortion ... disruptive ... ideological ... misquotati ...[text shortened]... empt to give divegeester the flick [and dodge him] by describing his dissent as being "in jest"?
Originally posted by josephwI'm happy to get into this (all over again) if you wish.
Having an emotional meltdown dive?
If I ignored your posts perhaps I was away for a day or two. Did you consider that? Do you hear me whining when you don't reply to every post I make?
No one is at my beck and call. The Bible is the final authority on the topic of eternal life or eternal judgement. Your belief, if as you say you are a Christian, must b ...[text shortened]... works are cast into the lake of fire. What do you think I'm supposed to do with that? Ignor it?
Originally posted by josephw
Having an emotional meltdown dive?
If I ignored your posts perhaps I was away for a day or two. Did you consider that? Do you hear me whining when you don't reply to every post I make?
No one is at my beck and call. The Bible is the final authority on the topic of eternal life or eternal judgement. Your belief, if as you say you are a Christian, must b ...[text shortened]... works are cast into the lake of fire. What do you think I'm supposed to do with that? Ignor it?
All I'm asking is that you produce the proof texts for your contention that those who are cast into the lake of fire don't remain there for eternity.