@FMF
Your assertion that your absorbed-from-your-environment superstitious outlook and beliefs somehow create a basis of an ultimate right judgment
But while you talk about superstition we have Someone in history who epitomizes the highest standard of human morality.
The Christian theists has a model to point to in time and space in history.
You have to get to work constructing a massively convoluted conspiracy theory that Christ was dreamed up.
on what ought and ought not be done is purely subjective
On what grounds is this "purely subjective" with me but your criticism not "purely subjective" with you?
If our moral standards are all just "purely subjective" then yours are also "purely subjective" and need not be assumed they're any more valid. You shoot yourself in the foot.
That is unless you are playing the part of a final arbitrator.
I believe Someone else besides you and I is a transcendent final arbitrator - God.
~ as is my moral compass, and, indeed, as is everyone's.
Then if everyone's "moral compass" is just an opinion with no more or less validity then anyone else's then your's concerning my compass is inflicted with the same untrustworthy limitation.
Again you have to steal from a God grounded universe in order to argue against God. Your argument presupposes an ultimate knowing of what is really real and what is just illusionary - "just subjective to YOU sonship. Says ME."
You're arguing that man is the measure of all things and FMF is
the man.