Spirituality
05 Apr 18
20 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfGod sets the rules and the criteria by which we are righteous. His rules, not mine. He could theoretically change the rules (God can do anything,) but His nature and character as revealed in the Bible argue against that proposition.
Once an OSAS'er has declared himself "saved" ~ for believing he is "saved" and for absolutely no other reason ~ even "God" can't undo it, because, apparently, that would make "God" a liar. 😕
20 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeWell I’ll take that for what it’s worth lol. Sounds like a lot of mumbo jumbo masquerading as science but whatever.
Freud would have had a field day with you. First, childhood regression operating as a defense mechanism and now clear conflict between the 'id' (primitive part of the mind) and the super-ego, consumed as you are by self-gratification and your own amusement.
Again, not an online diagnosis, but an observation of your behavior in this forum.
How would you diagnose not only your own behavior in this forum but the amount of time you spend arguing and attacking people in here?
Originally posted by @romans1009You feel persecuted by people who disagree with you?!
Well I’ll take that for what it’s worth lol. Sounds like a lot of mumbo jumbo masquerading as science but whatever.
How would you diagnose not only your own behavior in this forum but the amount of time you spend arguing and attacking people in here?
Would you like to hear what Freud has to say about that particular complex?
20 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYou like to jump to conclusions, don’t you? You must get a lot of exercise doing that.
You feel persecuted by people who disagree with you?!
Would you like to hear what Freud has to say about that particular complex?
How would you diagnose your own behavior in here? Is your obsession over trivialities and refusal to admit when you’re wrong signs of a psychologically healthy person in your view?
20 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Sorry, did I miss you admitting you were wrong in your correction of another poster's grammar?
You like to jump to conclusions, don’t you? You must get a lot of exercise doing that.
How would you diagnose your own behavior in here? Is your obsession over trivialities and refusal to admit when you’re wrong signs of a psychologically healthy person in your view?
I only saw the deflection.
21 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeStill obsessing over trivialities? Still claiming you have no notion of divine law? Still refusing to offer a diagnosis of your behavior in the SF or an explanation of why an atheist such as yourself spends so much time here?
Sorry, did I miss you admitting you were wrong in your correction of another poster's grammar?
I only saw the deflection.
23 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke🙂
Sorry, did I miss you admitting you were wrong in your correction of another poster's grammar?
I only saw the deflection.
Originally posted by @suzianneWhat are you talking about “fist swinging”? My post was polite and completely on topic.
Feel free to actually answer the question, instead of knuckle-dragging. If you so eagerly jump into a conversation, you must have something, besides fist-swinging, to say.
Here’s what I asked:
John 10:16
I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.
“You think that the most reasonable and likely explaination of this text is that Jesus was referring to followers he has on other planets?
23 Apr 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterI think He was referring to Gentiles.
What are you talking about “fist swinging”? My post was polite and completely on topic.
Here’s what I asked:
John 10:16
I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.
“[b]You think that the most reasonable and likely explaination of this text is that Jesus was referring to followers he has on other planets?[/b]
23 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Why are your errors trivialities?
Still obsessing over trivialities? Still claiming you have no notion of divine law? Still refusing to offer a diagnosis of your behavior in the SF or an explanation of why an atheist such as yourself spends so much time here?
Talk us through it.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeIs your choke collar off again?
Why are your errors trivialities?
Talk us through it.
When are you planning to apologize for repeatedly falsely claiming I was another poster? Was that an example of your “impeccable morality?”
Is your refusal to apologize for that an example of your “impeccable morality?”
Truth is, you have no “impeccable morality” or even morality. What you have is a choke collar that your family members and co-workers tug on to keep you in line.
When you’re free from the choke collar, like you are on here, the civilized facade falls away and the savage that you truly are emerges. Pretty sick stuff.
Originally posted by @romans1009I am categorical this is not your first account on this site. You arrived under a deception and that cloud has never gone away.
Is your choke collar off again?
When are you planning to apologize for repeatedly falsely claiming I was another poster? Was that an example of your “impeccable morality?”
Is your refusal to apologize for that an example of your “impeccable morality?”
Truth is, you have no “impeccable morality” or even morality. What you have is a choke collar t ...[text shortened]... e, the civilized facade falls away and the savage that you truly are emerges. Pretty sick stuff.
Hey Sam?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeAnd you know this how exactly?
I am categorical this is not your first account on this site. You arrived under a deception and that cloud has never gone away.
Hey Sam?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThe same way I knew FetchMyJunk was you.
And you know this how exactly?
Was I wrong about that deception?