@pb1022 saidThat would hardly be an original thread.
Why don’t you start a thread on what’s false and historically inaccurate in the Holy Bible?
Do you really think so many people, many of them very smart, would believe the Bible is the Word of God if the Bible contained false and historically inaccurate information?
Many 'very smart' people believe in evolution, but that doesn't stop you from dismissing it as false, hey?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThere’s more evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ than there is for macroevolution, hey?
That would hardly be an original thread.
Many 'very smart' people believe in evolution, but that doesn't stop you from dismissing it as false, hey?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAnd the “very smart” people who believe in the theory of evolution have blinders on when it comes to that subject because they’re desperate to try to justify their atheism.
That would hardly be an original thread.
Many 'very smart' people believe in evolution, but that doesn't stop you from dismissing it as false, hey?
Enoch 22:1-15
[1]From thence I proceeded to another spot, where I saw on the west a great and lofty mountain, a strong rock, and four delightful places
[2]Internally it was deep, capacious, and very smooth; as smooth as if it had been rolled over: it was both deep and dark to behold
[3]Then Raphael, one of the holy angels who were with me, answered and said, These are the delightful places where the spirits, the souls of the dead, will be collected; for them were they formed; and here will be collected all the souls of the sons of men
[4]These places, in which they dwell, shall they occupy until the day of judgment, and until their appointed period
[5]Their appointed period will be long, even until the great judgment And I saw the spirits of the sons of men who were dead; and their voices reached to heaven, while they were accusing
[6]Then I inquired of Raphael, an angel who was with me, and said, Whose spirit is that, the voice of which reaches to heaven, and accuses?
[7]He answered, saying, This is the spirit of Abel, who was slain by Cain his brother; and who will accuse that brother, until his seed be destroyed from the face of the earth;
[8]Until his seed perish from the seed of the human race
[9]At that time therefore I inquired respecting him, and respecting the general judgment, saying, Why is one separated from another? He answered, Three separations have been made between the spirits of the dead, and thus have the spirits of the righteous been separated
[10]Namely, by a chasm, by water, and by light above it
[11]And in the same way likewise are sinners separated when they die, and are buried in the earth; judgment not overtaking them in their lifetime
[12]Here their souls are separated Moreover, abundant is their suffering until the time of the great judgment, the castigation, and the torment of those who eternally execrate, whose souls are punished and bound there for ever
[13]And thus has it been from the beginning of the world Thus has there existed a separation between the souls of those who utter complaints, and of those who watch for their destruction, to slaughter them in the day of sinners
[14]A receptacle of this sort has been formed for the souls of unrighteous men, and of sinners; of those who have completed crime, and associated with the impious, whom they resemble Their souls shall not be annihilated in the day of judgment, neither shall they arise from this place Then I blessed God,
[15]And said, Blessed be my Lord, the Lord of glory and of righteousness, who reigns over all for ever and for ever
@rajk999 saidGive it a rest.
Enoch 22:1-15
[1]From thence I proceeded to another spot, where I saw on the west a great and lofty mountain, a strong rock, and four delightful places
[2]Internally it was deep, capacious, and very smooth; as smooth as if it had been rolled over: it was both deep and dark to behold
[3]Then Raphael, one of the holy angels who were with me, answered and said, These are the ...[text shortened]... lessed be my Lord, the Lord of glory and of righteousness, who reigns over all for ever and for ever
@ghost-of-a-duke saidMany very smart people disagree with it, does that stop you from accepting it?
That would hardly be an original thread.
Many 'very smart' people believe in evolution, but that doesn't stop you from dismissing it as false, hey?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNo idea if they are or not.
And you don't think smart Christians are desperate to justify the historical accuracy of the Bible?!
But I know atheists use the theory of evolution as a justification for their atheism.
One fellow on here couldn’t provide evidence for the theory of evolution’s central claim - that one species turns into another species by random mutations and natural selection - despite being asked nearly a dozen times.
@pb1022 saidI provided plenty of evidence, you just dismiss the entire fossil record because you have little or no knowledge other than that you have gleaned from whatever creationist website you used when you 'looked into' evolution.
No idea if they are or not.
But I know atheists use the theory of evolution as a justification for their atheism.
One fellow on here couldn’t provide evidence for the theory of evolution’s central claim - that one species turns into another species by random mutations and natural selection - despite being asked nearly a dozen times.
Perhaps you're ready to offer your alternative explanation for how species develop over time? I'm sure it must be very compelling...
@avalanchethecat saidJust saying “The fossil record” isn’t providing evidence, champ.
I provided plenty of evidence, you just dismiss the entire fossil record because you have little or no knowledge other than that you have gleaned from whatever creationist website you used when you 'looked into' evolution.
Perhaps you're ready to offer your alternative explanation for how species develop over time? I'm sure it must be very compelling...
Nor is saying, “Lots of scientists believe it!” 😉
@avalanchethecat saidYou’re so desperate to change the subject from the theory of evolution to creationism. Why is that?
It's hard evidence, chump.
What evidence do you have for whatever as yet unspecified alternative theory to which you presumably ascribe?
But I understand. If I were an evolutionist, I wouldn’t want to try to defend the theory either.