18 Nov 05
Originally posted by lucifershammer...and you could learn alot from everyone else.
Not that it matters (we have no right to "vote" anyone off these forums), but I would vote to keep him on the forum.
For one thing, unless he breaks the "House Rules" (aka TOC), he has every right to post his views here.
For another thing, I personally value his willingness to [usually] back his position with solid research despite all the abuse. howardgee, DavidC - you guys can learn something from him.
Peace,
LH
Except that you are too blinded by religion and too stupid to do so.
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressThanks for taking the time and effort compiling this absolutely hilarious list.
Here are some of marauder's posts that I have picked out over the past seven days.
Do we want him in our forum? I vote no.
16 Nov '05 20:48
What a childish fool you are. Grow up, get out, have a few beers and get laid. You might actually stop being such a twit and someday look back at all this and say "What a self-righteous jerk I was!
...[text shortened]... ganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
(This would explain it).
Guess the truth about yourself hurts, huh?
Tell me CE, have you ever stopped to consider that maybe No1 is completely spot on and that his insults are accurate and well deserved?
If you did, then for once in your life you would be right.
18 Nov 05
marauder is a f****** p****. he continues defending his position even when he's wrong. he thinks he's never wrong. he likes to twist his words around. as well as others'.
that being said: he doesn't spam, he can add some intelligence to threads (when he's not too busy with personal attacks), and he usually writes in a professional manner (in terms of grammar and spelling, not WHAT he says). furthermore, i see no reason to ban him. what was listed in the original post, we are all guilty of from time to time. if u wanna get on someone's case, get stang the hell outta here. if anyone deserves a ban, it's him.
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressThe moderators have allowed most of his posts to stay up and he remains free to post. This despite the fact that he's been here for over a year and I doubt his style has changed much.
You must not know much about Christians or the moderators here.
Prove me wrong, chump!
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressHow many of these posts were moderated? Guess your ideas on what is acceptable in the Forums and what the Moderators think is acceptable is vastly different. Some of those posts were jokes directed at people I know well here like Phlab. Many were in direct response to insults hurled by other people (try posting the posts I was responding to). And the others?? Tough titty. I admire your lack of a life sufficient to do such exhaustive research on such a trivial matter; if you would put the same effort into actually having any knowledge of what you were talking about maybe you wouldn't come across as such a dunce.
Here are some of marauder's posts that I have picked out over the past seven days.
Do we want him in our forum? I vote no.
16 Nov '05 20:48
What a childish fool you are. Grow up, get out, have a few beers and get laid. You might actually stop being such a twit and someday look back at all this and say "What a self-righteous jerk I was!
...[text shortened]... ganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
(This would explain it).
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by no1marauderLet's review:
I admire your lack of a life sufficient to do such exhaustive research on such a trivial matter; if you would put the same effort into actually having any knowledge of what you were talking about maybe you wouldn't come across as such a dunce.
Those of you who dislike #1, why do you care if he thinks you are a
fool? Hmm? Let's say, for the sake of argument, that #1 never made
any good points ever and just called people fools. What are the
implications? Are your feelings hurt by an anonymous person with no
brain? Does the quantity of his posts make the forum unreadable?
C'mon folks, get over it.
Now, if you read carefully, often times #1 does make good points.
Often times, they are controversial (his libertarian perspectives) or
challenging (his theological perspectives) or informative (his American
history and legal perspectives).
And, if you stop being self-righteous for a moment, you'll realize that
his arresting wit is actually quite funny. I mean, who could possibly
write:
what anti-psychotic meds would be most effective for his condition or why you are sooooooooooooo gullible you believe this BS??
My comments are clear; have someone who's not an idiot explain them to you.
as part of the Islamofascistatheistcommunist conspiracy out to destroy America, I am paid well to write my propaganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
This is funny stuff. There was one he said to Ivanhoe about crying
into his pillow some months ago that made me laugh so hard that
I woke up my wife.
#1 has laid into me more than a few times and, 10 times out of 10,
I find myself laughing out loud.
You don't like his comments? Don't respond to them. You're a big
boy or girl: skim them and move on. Or, develop a sense of humor
about yourself and laugh and ignore him.
If you think he's an idiot, why give his comments any currency? If you
don't, then address his concerns. And if you want to learn how to
insult with style, take a page or two out of his book.
Nemesio
P.S., Just read the one I quoted above. You mean to tell me that you
think it's not clever? I can't wait to use this line on one of my friends.
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by no1marauderI'm guessing he didnt see you call anybody " jerkwad" yet
How many of these posts were moderated? Guess your ideas on what is acceptable in the Forums and what the Moderators think is acceptable is vastly different. Some of those posts were jokes directed at people I know well here like Phlab. Many were in direct response to insults hurled by other people (try posting the posts I was responding to). And the oth ...[text shortened]... ng any knowledge of what you were talking about maybe you wouldn't come across as such a dunce.
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesOriginally posted by DoctorScribbles
If we were to vote him off, who would speak these truths in his stead?
That's right. I've been voted off the forums before. I don't see why it can't happen to no1. He's been asking for it for a long, long time.
It’s amazing how fast you change your colors.
18 Nov 05
1 edit
Originally posted by howardgeeGuess the truth about yourself hurts, huh?
Thanks for taking the time and effort compiling this absolutely hilarious list.
Guess the truth about yourself hurts, huh?
Tell me CE, have you ever stopped to consider that maybe No1 is completely spot on and that his insults are accurate and well deserved?
If you did, then for once in your life you would be right.
Not at all. The reactions here explain a lot.
Tell me CE, have you ever stopped to consider that maybe No1 is completely spot on and that his insults are accurate and well deserved?
If you did, then for once in your life you would be right.
Insults don’t convince. That’s what you and marauder don't get.
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by lioyankFrom time to time yes. Marauder makes a career out of it.
marauder is a f****** p****. he continues defending his position even when he's wrong. he thinks he's never wrong. he likes to twist his words around. as well as others'.
that being said: he doesn't spam, he can add some intelligence to threads (when he's not too busy with personal attacks), and he usually writes in a professional manner (in terms of ...[text shortened]... anna get on someone's case, get stang the hell outta here. if anyone deserves a ban, it's him.
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressYou don't know Dr S. well enough to understand that his first
Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
That's right. I've been voted off the forums before. I don't see why it can't happen to no1. He's been asking for it for a long, long time.
It’s amazing how fast you change your colors.
post was sarcasm. You would have to be able to see the posts
in July-August 2004 in a forum that no longer exists in order to
understand.
Suffice it to say, you understandably misunderstood.
Nemesio
18 Nov 05
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressWhatever would make you think that I am trying to convince far out fanatics of your ilk anything? You are beyond where reason and logic can help. When you people say something that deserves scorn, you get scorn. djbecker posted today that people dying of AIDS was part of God's plan for population control; BF101 said Tom Paine was damned to Hell. I'm sure you don't find those comments offensive, but you pitch a hissy fit if I make a joke about Selma Hayek's snake dance. Grow up.
[b]Guess the truth about yourself hurts, huh?
Not at all. The reactions here explain a lot.
Tell me CE, have you ever stopped to consider that maybe No1 is completely spot on and that his insults are accurate and well deserved?
If you did, then for once in your life you would be right.
Insults don’t convince. That’s what you’ve failed to teach marauder.[/b]