Here are some of marauder's posts that I have picked out over the past seven days.
Do we want him in our forum? I vote no.
16 Nov '05 20:48
What a childish fool you are. Grow up, get out, have a few beers and get laid. You might actually stop being such a twit and someday look back at all this and say "What a self-righteous jerk I was!
16 Nov '05 20:15
Part of me thinks no one could be so mind-numbingly stupid and brainwashed, so you guys must be parodying fundamentalist "Christians". But sometimes I actually think that you really "think" the way you post and that's truly scary.
16 Nov '05 19:48
Stop making a fool of yourself.
16 Nov '05 19:33
I pity you even more now that I know you never saw Selma Hayek doing the snake dance in Dusk to Dawn.
16 Nov '05 18:54
Yes you apparently missed the line where they were handing out functioning brains. What was all that insane spouting about Satan worship, nutjob?
15 Nov '05 17:12
Boy, you're pissy; wake up under the wrong side of the rock?
14 Nov '05 01:59
I truly hope that some day you can think and reason for yourself
13 Nov '05 20:07
You're obviously illiterate or an a**h*** or more probably both. Certain people keep bringing up the same tired point about the Site Admins being able to legally do whatever they want with their site and people like me are compelled to waste our typing skills acknowledging this although we've never said otherwise. The issue is what is a wise thing to do. Hopefully the people who kept bringing up the point will stop bringing it up as it's a given. And hopefully, you wouldn't be such an idiot, but that's toooooooo much to dream for.
13 Nov '05 19:00
Try reading the rest of the page, numbnuts.
13 Nov '05 18:08
You're pathetic;
13 Nov '05 17:54
Learn how to read, loser
13 Nov '05 17:44
Your last sentence shows what a contemptible piece of trash that you are.
13 Nov '05 17:32
Bitch to dj;
13 Nov '05 12:23
Stupidity. Try reading a post and responding to the points in it next time.
13 Nov '05 10:37
How pathetic that someone on an internet chess site who has never met me presumes to have some insight on how I conduct myself in my actual life.
(he might have a point with this one, he wouldn’t get far in a court room)
13 Nov '05 02:42
Go fkuk yourself, moron.
13 Nov '05 02:36
God, you're a f****** idiot.
13 Nov '05 02:28
My post was in response to your moronic decision to put a synopsis of a "Touched by an Angel" episode in a thread that was supposed to be an intelligent discussion of an issue.
13 Nov '05 02:01
Jerk, if you have nothing of consequence to say on the subject of this thread,
13 Nov '05 01:36
Get a life.
12 Nov '05 20:55
That is why you are a loser.
11 Nov '05 11:52
Your team sucks anyway.
11 Nov '05 11:12
I support people bitching. If people did not bitch, the powers that be would have no way of knowing what the average bitcher on the street wanted.
10 Nov '05 16:29
Fischer makes his own rules; can we be sure that even at 62 he couldn't beat Topalov? Those people here who smugly assert otherwise are talking out of their a**. /
10 Nov '05 14:56
Come off it, you little jerk;
10 Nov '05 14:48
I think your ban "wasen" a full thing and you soon will be gone back under the rock you crawled out from.
10 Nov '05 14:38
Does he still rate another chance as a poor abused kid? Is Hand membership an option?
10 Nov '05 12:49
What would you like to talk about: what anti-psychotic meds would be most effective for his condition or why you are sooooooooooooo gullible you believe this BS??
10 Nov '05 12:21
Moron: …
10 Nov '05 11:15
My comments are clear; have someone who's not an idiot explain them to you.
10 Nov '05 01:17
I guess I have to start going back to the KKK meetings.
09 Nov '05 21:33
If you think I'm trying to get an answer from you that makes any sense, you're sadly mistaken about that as well as most everything else.
09 Nov '05 20:01
It's pathetic to see someone suggesting that Jesus only says you should treat fellow believers in a charitable and loving manner; where do you guys come up with such rot?
(and he should have a clue?)
09 Nov '05 16:08
You are a f***ing retard. Do you know what the term "STATUS QUO" means? Have someone who likes talking to morons explain it to you.
You must like screwing 11 and 12 year olds since that's all you keep talking about in reference to this law. In fact, it would apply to every female up to 18 years old. Nature gave women of child bearing age the right to decide whether to have children or not, not me. Go bitch to it, s**thead.
09 Nov '05 15:55
You are a complete idiot.
09 Nov '05 11:14
as part of the Islamofascistatheistcommunist conspiracy out to destroy America, I am paid well to write my propaganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
(This would explain it).
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressIf we were to vote him off, who would speak these truths in his stead?
Here are some of marauder's posts that I have picked out over the past seven days.
Do we want him in our forum? I vote no.
16 Nov '05 20:48
What a childish fool you are. Grow up, get out, have a few beers and get laid. You might actually stop being such a twit and someday look back at all this and say "What a self-righteous jerk I was!
...[text shortened]... ganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
(This would explain it).
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressStop making a fool of yourself. You're obviously illiterate or an a**h*** or more probably both. You're pathetic.
Here are some of marauder's posts that I have picked out over the past seven days.
Do we want him in our forum? I vote no.
16 Nov '05 20:48
What a childish fool you are. Grow up, get out, have a few beers and get laid. You might actually stop being such a twit and someday look back at all this and say "What a self-righteous jerk I was!
...[text shortened]... ganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
(This would explain it).
Your last sentence shows what a contemptible piece of trash that you are. That is why you are a loser.
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressNot that it matters (we have no right to "vote" anyone off these forums), but I would vote to keep him on the forum.
Here are some of marauder's posts that I have picked out over the past seven days.
Do we want him in our forum? I vote no.
16 Nov '05 20:48
What a childish fool you are. Grow up, get out, have a few beers and get laid. You might actually stop being such a twit and someday look back at all this and say "What a self-righteous jerk I was!
...[text shortened]... ganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
(This would explain it).
For one thing, unless he breaks the "House Rules" (aka TOC), he has every right to post his views here.
For another thing, I personally value his willingness to [usually] back his position with solid research despite all the abuse. howardgee, DavidC - you guys can learn something from him.
Peace,
LH
Originally posted by schakuhrJudging from your picture I would expect this from you.
Stop making a fool of yourself. You're obviously illiterate or an a**h*** or more probably both. You're pathetic.
Your last sentence shows what a contemptible piece of trash that you are. That is why you are a loser.
Originally posted by lucifershammerNot that it matters (we have no right to "vote" anyone off these forums),
Not that it matters (we have no right to "vote" anyone off these forums), but I would vote to keep him on the forum.
For one thing, unless he breaks the "House Rules" (aka TOC), he has every right to post his views here.
For another thing, I personally value his willingness to [usually] back his position with solid research despite all the abuse. howardgee, DavidC - you guys can learn something from him.
Peace,
LH
Why not? Majority rules?
but I would vote to keep him on the forum.
May I ask why?
For one thing, unless he breaks the "House Rules" (aka TOC), he has every right to post his views here.
Is there an etiquette policy?
For another thing, I personally value his willingness to [usually] back his position with solid research despite all the abuse. howardgee, DavidC - you guys can learn something from him.
Ah, so the things that he says is solid research. Perhaps that explains your vote.
Peace,
Ok, you’re entitled to your opinion.
Originally posted by The Chess Express"So long as opinions are counted, rather than weighed, the better part will be overcome by the greater." John Calvin
Why not? Majority rules?
No1 may be abrasive, but he's nearly always correct when he calls some poser a fool. Very few posters on this site have argued with me and caused me to revise my position. No1 has done this.
Originally posted by WulebgrFrom my observation, no1 calls someone a fool (usually something like "pr*ck" or "j*rk" or "as-h-le"😉 in three situations:
"So long as opinions are counted, rather than weighed, the better part will be overcome by the greater." John Calvin
No1 may be abrasive, but he's nearly always correct when he calls some poser a fool. Very few posters on this site have argued with me and caused me to revise my position. No1 has done this.
(a) The person person is actually a fool
(b) no1 is up against the wall and refuses to budge from his position
(c) no1 is about to hit the books and do his research
Btw, I agree with the revised position bit. Ditto here.
Originally posted by The Chess Express
[b]Not that it matters (we have no right to "vote" anyone off these forums),
Why not? Majority rules?
but I would vote to keep him on the forum.
May I ask why?
For one thing, unless he breaks the "House Rules" (aka TOC), he has every right to post his views here.
Is there an etiquette policy?
For another ...[text shortened]... h. Perhaps that explains your vote.
[b]Peace,
Ok, you’re entitled to your opinion.[/b][/b]
TCE: Why not? Majority rules?
Not always. Quality over quantity.
TCE: Is there an etiquette policy?
The TOS* does ban abusive and vulgar language.
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressI've been the target of his ire on occasion, but I certainly would not want him to go.
Here are some of marauder's posts that I have picked out over the past seven days.
Do we want him in our forum? I vote no.
16 Nov '05 20:48
What a childish fool you are. Grow up, get out, have a few beers and get laid. You might actually stop being such a twit and someday look back at all this and say "What a self-righteous jerk I was!
...[text shortened]... ganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
(This would explain it).
Ignore the personal stuff. His contributions are intelligent, well-researched and often amusing. I can admit I learned a good deal during our "spat".
Plus, like it or not, he has been a force for good on this site.
Why would you want to lose such a voice from these forums?
(He's wrong about self-determination, though...)
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressStop making a fool of yourself.
Here are some of marauder's posts that I have picked out over the past seven days.
Do we want him in our forum? I vote no.
16 Nov '05 20:48
What a childish fool you are. Grow up, get out, have a few beers and get laid. You might actually stop being such a twit and someday look back at all this and say "What a self-righteous jerk I was!
...[text shortened]... ganda to undermine the moral values of our great Christian country.
(This would explain it).