@divegeester saidDoesn't matter. Some forms of discrimination are just opinions; others are bigotry.
Suzianne was being hypocritical in that she herself holds a discriminatory belief against republicans in claiming that a Republican cannot be a true Christian.
Suzianne discriminates against bigots. She is not a hypocrite for doing so.
293d
@fmf saidYou started a thread about the First Amendment and civil liberties. Regardless of your intentions that a is legal and political topic.
I suggest you take this to the Debates Forum. On this forum, I am interested in prejudice and intolerance rooted in religious faith.
Suzianne is intolerant against bigots? Great. That's how anyone should be regardless of religious affiliation.
293d
@vivify saidAs I said before...
You started a thread about the First Amendment and civil liberties. Regardless of your intentions that a is legal and political topic.
Nonsense. Of course it's a spiritual topic and it's here on the Spirituality Forum rather than the Debates Forum.
The questions are [1] is this, as some claim, a victory for religious liberty? Or [2] has this ruling, as others claim, legitimized a poison in US society?
The "liberty" and "poison" here are in the context of spiritual discourse and professing / acting upon religious faith, clearly.
You should perhaps take your purely "legal and political" stuff to the Debates Forum.