Go back
First amendment right to refuse services to...

First amendment right to refuse services to...

Spirituality

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

-Removed-
Doesn't matter. Some forms of discrimination are just opinions; others are bigotry.

Suzianne discriminates against bigots. She is not a hypocrite for doing so.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@vivify said
For third or fourth time: is Suzianne advocating that Republicans have the civil rights overturned they way Republicans have done to gays?
I suggest you take this to the Debates Forum. On this forum, I am interested in prejudice and intolerance rooted in religious faith.

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@fmf said
I suggest you take this to the Debates Forum. On this forum, I am interested in prejudice and intolerance rooted in religious faith.
You started a thread about the First Amendment and civil liberties. Regardless of your intentions that a is legal and political topic.

Suzianne is intolerant against bigots? Great. That's how anyone should be regardless of religious affiliation.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@vivify said
Suzianne is intolerant against bigots? Great. That's how anyone should be regardless of religious affiliation.
"Bigots"? Suzianne is prejudiced against ALL Christians with conservative values.

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@fmf said
Her own unacknowledged and visceral prejudice makes her a hypocrite.
she has visceral prejudice against religious bigots?

Bravo.

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@fmf said
"Bigots"? Suzianne is prejudiced against ALL Christians with conservative values.
And? It's an opinion. Not all opinions are bigotry.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@vivify said
she has visceral prejudice against religious bigots?

Bravo.
Nope. Against all Christians with conservative values. She asserts that "they cannot possibly be followers of Jesus".

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@fmf said
Nope. Against all Christians with conservative values. She asserts that "they cannot possibly be followers of Jesus".
Who cares. Still not bigotry.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@vivify said
You started a thread about the First Amendment and civil liberties. Regardless of your intentions that a is legal and political topic.
As I said before...

Nonsense. Of course it's a spiritual topic and it's here on the Spirituality Forum rather than the Debates Forum.

The questions are [1] is this, as some claim, a victory for religious liberty? Or [2] has this ruling, as others claim, legitimized a poison in US society?

The "liberty" and "poison" here are in the context of spiritual discourse and professing / acting upon religious faith, clearly.

You should perhaps take your purely "legal and political" stuff to the Debates Forum.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@vivify said
You started a thread about the First Amendment and civil liberties. Regardless of your intentions that a is legal and political topic.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@vivify said
Good grief. Are you not reading my posts?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.