@Liljo
The bad part about red dwarf's is they are not nice tame stars like ours.
Ours shoots out corona discharges that can kill satellites but the blasts from dwarf stars are significantly stronger than our tame sun.
I think it is the result of having lost a lot of the mass that star enjoyed early on and fusion does keep on and keeps changing the mass, lowering the mass slowly over billions of years.
Then it seems to me the inner core of a star that is as old as a red dwarf, in our sun all the Firey stuff going on in our sun is mostly contained by the thick layer of goo that is the outer layers of the sun.
I think those outer layers shield us from the holy terror of what is going on in the core.
You don't want to be anywhere NEAR that core and that mass in a red dwarf is more of a significant percentage of the total mass of the star, having run out mainly of hydrogen and now is running through the last of the available fusion reactions, going up the periodic chart. When it gets to iron, fusion ceases completely and then it very gradually just cools down.
That means those planets are bombarded maybe daily with a blast from the parent star and suppose it is what, a thousand years into our future and we have spacecraft fast enough to get there in our lifetimes and they may find sterile planets where life never had a chance to evolve because when a natural biological experiment happens, and something more complex comes together, a blast of X rays and such from the parent star tears the molecule bonds apart and they go back to being just hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and the like or maybe water molecules and carbon.
Just my take on what we might find if we ever get humans that far from home.