Originally posted by FMFI think that all one needs to know (and as I said, it's glaringly obvious) is that the answer to that question is "not you." No measuring involved.
You asked "who really adds more to the forum?" Seeing as this involves calculating whether there is "more" [or 'less'] of something, then unless you have some way of measuring it, all you are saying is that you prefer someone else's posting to mine.
More in terms of what? More drool? More slobbbering? More insidious traps? More unsubstantiated assertions? More irrelevancy?
While Suzianne does make some unsubstantiated assertions she does at least attempt to engage in spiritual discussion whereas you have demonstrated practically no interest beyond what you can glean in order to belittle other people. I would have to rule in favour of Suzianne as adding more content at least to the spirituality forum.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo you don't like my posting either?
More in terms of what? More drool? More slobbbering? More insidious traps? More unsubstantiated assertions? More irrelevancy?
While Suzianne does make some unsubstantiated assertions she does at least attempt to engage in spiritual discussion whereas you have demonstrated practically no interest beyond what you can glean in order to belittle ot ...[text shortened]... ld have to rule in favour of Suzianne as adding more content at least to the spirituality forum.
Originally posted by SuzianneYes, and in the course of that exact same conversation ~ in which you deemed your opinion (about Grampy Bobby adding more to the forum than me) to be pertinent ~ I have now asked you if - in your opinion - you also (along with Grampy Bobby) add more to this forum and the Spirituality Forum than me?
I was comparing you and GB, as per the conversation I was replying to, not you and me.
Originally posted by FMFYou can turn off the interrogation machine.
Yes, and in the course of that exact same conversation ~ in which you deemed your opinion (about Grampy Bobby adding more to the forum than me) to be pertinent ~ I have now asked you if - in your opinion - you also (along with Grampy Bobby) add more to this forum and the Spirituality Forum than me?
Originally posted by SuzianneA non sequitur is a conversational and literary device, often used
Why are you implying that I don't?
We weren't talking about tea mugs, you know.
for comedic purposes. It is something said that, because of
its apparent lack of meaning relative to what preceded it, seems
absurd to the point of being humorous or confusing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(literary_device)
Originally posted by wolfgang59That IS one way to put it.
A non sequitur is a conversational and literary device, often used
for [b]comedic purposes. It is something said that, because of
its apparent lack of meaning relative to what preceded it, seems
absurd to the point of being humorous or confusing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(literary_device)[/b]
But there's not much comedy in these parts these days, especially with the harassment twins about.