Go back
Drop the subscription price for 2007

Drop the subscription price for 2007

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by worldwidewebster
no I'm not expecting anyone else to pay my subscription, I think $29.95 is a bit steep (presuambly $US as well) just remember internet chess shouldn't be the domain of rich cyber-geeks
Looks like you're playing 6 games for free already, what more do you want? Stop looking for handouts and get yourself to work so you can earn the sub fee.

Sorry, haven't had my coffee yet.😞

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by worldwidewebster
Dump it back to $19.95 for the year and even I might consider subscribing
Big incentive for Russ to drop the price then. 🙄

Knock $10 off for all others subs and worldwidewebster may consider taking out a membership.

Back to fantasy land for you. If you cancelled your sub to www.fantasygirls.org.asm for a month you could subscribe here for 2 years

😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

of course if $10 was knocked off the price that'd leave more cash for scotch

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by worldwidewebster
of course if $10 was knocked off the price that'd leave more cash for scotch
I pay $10 bucks. You might want to lock your price at the 29... it will keep going up.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by worldwidewebster
of course if $10 was knocked off the price that'd leave more cash for scotch
Yes, I'm sure that would do a lot for the owners of this site that you have
more cash for scotch. In fact, I'm ready to go as far as to say that it is their
very goal with this site. 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

well I'm talking about single Malts like Glnfiddich and not NZ Scotch like Wilson's, which btw retails for even less than an RHP sub

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
Yes, I'm sure that would do a lot for the owners of this site that you have
more cash for scotch. In fact, I'm ready to go as far as to say that it is their
very goal with this site. 😀
Xe'll need to find a chess site, the owner of which also sells Scotch.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by worldwidewebster
well I'm talking about single Malts like Glnfiddich and not NZ Scotch like Wilson's, which btw retails for even less than an RHP sub
freeloading on chess sites, drinking bottom end single malts... it can't get much worse for you really can it?

Vote Up
Vote Down

at least they're single malts

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by worldwidewebster
at least they're single malts
and?

Vote Up
Vote Down

and?

Higher end single malts would fall more easily within my price range if $10 was shaved off the subscription to RHP.
Look just drop the price will you....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by worldwidewebster
and?

Higher end single malts would fall more easily within my price range if $10 was shaved off the subscription to RHP.
Look just drop the price will you....
I think that is the most persuasive argument for dropping the subsription
price I've heard as yet. Drop it so you can raise the quality of your single
malt. Brilliant.

Do I sense a "this is gold" post coming, phlab?

Vote Up
Vote Down

despite plunging to the depths of things alcoholic, I maintain that there is/are valid rationale(s) for stripping $10 off the price of subs

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by worldwidewebster
despite plunging to the depths of things alcoholic, I maintain that there is/are valid rationale(s) for stripping $10 off the price of subs
Please share it/them with us.

Edit - if you could present the current business model vs your proposed one this will save alot of questions around detail.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.