01 Jun '23 11:51>
@metal-brain saidYou are certainly proof of your own premise!
@kevcvs57
My parents vaccinated me when I was a child.
@metal-brain saidYou are certainly proof of your own premise!
@kevcvs57
My parents vaccinated me when I was a child.
@shavixmir saidNo, you did not. You said this:
I did in my first post.
@shavixmir saidI know. Are you claiming they were wrong or right for making that decision?
The court decided that the underlying medical condition could have been triggered by the vaccine.
And ordered a payment.
R
E
A
D
@divegeester saidIf that is possible maybe the vaccine court will pay me for that too. Where will it end?
You are certainly proof of your own premise!
@metal-brain saidThe article even says the government and health authority state the vaccine didn’t cause autism.
No, you did not. You said this:
"However, many things could have triggered it. A flu, diabetes, an accident, basically anything which could undercut the body’s ability to create enough energy."
So you are saying the vaccine court paid for an injury and there is no proof the vaccine caused the injury. Why did the vaccine court pay for something that has no proof the ...[text shortened]... o proof, but possible? LOL.
Will you now state for the record that vaccines might cause autism?
@shavixmir saidOf course. They have been lying about Vaccines all along. If liars saying so is proof to you how do you know anything you are told is a lie? Do you take a poll?
The article even says the government and health authority state the vaccine didn’t cause autism.
R
E
A
D
Seriously. Your own bloody article, kid.
@metal-brain saidRetrospective meta-analyses have been conducted on millions of people, grouped only by whether or not they have been vaccinated. Guess what the difference is between these two groups when you ask what are the rates of autism?
The proof: Hannah Poling
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/
@metal-brain saidNope.
The proof: Hannah Poling
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/
In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't "cause" her autism, but "resulted" in it.
@soothfast saidYou did what I couldn't be arsed doing.
Nope.
From your own link:In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't "cause" her autism, but "resulted" in it.
@soothfast saidResulted?
Nope.
From your own link:In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't "cause" her autism, but "resulted" in it.
@wildgrass saidIf vaccines did not cause autism why did the vaccine court pay out to Hannah Poling?
Retrospective meta-analyses have been conducted on millions of people, grouped only by whether or not they have been vaccinated. Guess what the difference is between these two groups when you ask what are the rates of autism?
Zero. There's no difference.
Vaccines don't cause autism.
@metal-brain saidFunny double standard here. When Fox News settled with Dominion Voting Systems to the tune of almost $800 million recently, you did not accept that as proof that Tucker Carlson lied about anything. You started a whole flippin' thread about it, or maybe seven.
If vaccines did not cause autism why did the vaccine court pay out to Hannah Poling?
@soothfast saidNo, because you have not proven he lied about Dominion voting machines. You merely assume he did because you falsely believe he was fired. He was not fired because he is still under contract with FOX NEWS and getting paid to do nothing.
Funny double standard here. When Fox News settled with Dominion Voting Systems to the tune of almost $800 million recently, you did not accept that as proof that Tucker Carlson lied about anything. You started a whole flippin' thread about it, or maybe seven.
Anyway, hide behind the apron of childish wordplay, why don't you, by pretending not to know the difference between a "cause" and a "result" (also known as an effect).
@soothfast saidCocaine does not cause heart attacks. Cocaine just results in heart attacks. Did I use those terms the way you would?
Funny double standard here. When Fox News settled with Dominion Voting Systems to the tune of almost $800 million recently, you did not accept that as proof that Tucker Carlson lied about anything. You started a whole flippin' thread about it, or maybe seven.
Anyway, hide behind the apron of childish wordplay, why don't you, by pretending not to know the difference between a "cause" and a "result" (also known as an effect).