1. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2700
    02 Jun '23 20:28
    @metal-brain said
    " Everyone who gets a vaccine must understand that there is a small risk, accept that risk, and also accept any possible consequences."

    But not the vaccine makers? They are largely immune from lawsuits, so they do not accept the risk in the form of liability. The taxpayer pays for it though government tax money funding the vaccine court. That removes the incentive for ...[text shortened]... e National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 must be repealed. Criminals are making our vaccines.
    Vaccines must undergo rigorous testing and several stages of successful clinical trials before being approved by the FDA for use. Same in the UK. Same in Germany. Same in France, and so on. That's the incentive for vaccine developers and manufacturers to make reasonably safe vaccines.

    Under these conditions, to also subject vaccine developers to the whims of juries every single time someone has an adverse reaction to a vaccine would undoubtedly become a disincentive to develop or manufacture vaccines. Polio would come back. Measles, too, and things far worse. The harm done to society were this to happen would be incalculably worse than the current regime.

    As usual you allow for no shades of gray, and give no thought to balance or compromise. With you it's all or nothing, whereas in reality life is imperfect and risk always present.
  2. SubscriberWajoma
    Die Cheeseburger
    Provocation
    Joined
    01 Sep '04
    Moves
    77423
    02 Jun '23 21:35
    @soothfast said
    Vaccines must undergo rigorous testing and several stages of successful clinical trials before being approved by the FDA for use. Same in the UK. Same in Germany. Same in France, and so on. That's the incentive for vaccine developers and manufacturers to make reasonably safe vaccines.

    Under these conditions, to also subject vaccine developers to the whims of j ...[text shortened]... romise. With you it's all or nothing, whereas in reality life is imperfect and risk always present.
    "Vaccines must undergo rigorous testing and several stages of successful clinical trials before being approved by the FDA for use."

    We know this to be BS as evidenced by the recent clotshot, there simply wasn't enough time for 'rigorous testing', yet it was given the tick by the FDA. The FDA and has lost credibility. Apart from that the FDA can be a mojor bottleneck for new medications. Here's the solution: Privatise the FDA, then people can choose to take FDA approved drugs or other more experimental tech like the seizure syrup. BTW this is something Trump loosened up, in that if you're likely terminal in the US you can take experimental un-FDA-approved drugs. A step in the right direction.

    "With you it's all or nothing, whereas in reality life is imperfect and risk always present."

    Couldn't agree more, and it's not for you to assess that risk, how much or how little others must take, if there is risk it must be voluntary. It wasn't so long ago. in the last 2 years actually, we'd see the argument rolled out by fauci, lyinghorsefaceNZprimeminister, and many others: "You got to take the juice to protect others"

    A blatant lie. An undisputed lie.

    YouTube
  3. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    03 Jun '23 01:27
    @soothfast said
    Vaccines must undergo rigorous testing and several stages of successful clinical trials before being approved by the FDA for use. Same in the UK. Same in Germany. Same in France, and so on. That's the incentive for vaccine developers and manufacturers to make reasonably safe vaccines.

    Under these conditions, to also subject vaccine developers to the whims of j ...[text shortened]... romise. With you it's all or nothing, whereas in reality life is imperfect and risk always present.
    But not the vaccine makers? They are largely immune from lawsuits, so they do not accept the risk in the form of liability. The taxpayer pays for it though government tax money funding the vaccine court. So unsafe vaccines profits are subsidized.
  4. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    04 Jun '23 01:09
    @soothfast said
    Vaccines must undergo rigorous testing and several stages of successful clinical trials before being approved by the FDA for use. Same in the UK. Same in Germany. Same in France, and so on. That's the incentive for vaccine developers and manufacturers to make reasonably safe vaccines.

    Under these conditions, to also subject vaccine developers to the whims of j ...[text shortened]... romise. With you it's all or nothing, whereas in reality life is imperfect and risk always present.
    Only if they are FDA approved and the covid vaccines were not FDA approved. They only had emergency use authorization. Do you know why? Because they were not rigorously tested. It was a rush job.

    https://avicennamedicalreview.com/pfizer-exec-admits-vaccines-were-not-tested-for-preventing-covid-transmission/

    You also cannot sue a vaccine maker in the USA for a vaccine that does not have FDA approval. They have a license to kill people.
  5. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    18 Jun '23 05:24
    @Soothfast
    Why won't anyone debate him?

    https://www.thewrap.com/joe-rogan-rfk-jr-debate-peter-hotez-elon-musk/

    Lots of people talk a lot of crap just like you, but they cower once they are asked to debate RFK jr., even for $100,000.00
  6. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    18 Jun '23 05:371 edit
    @metal-brain said
    @Soothfast
    Why won't anyone debate him?

    https://www.thewrap.com/joe-rogan-rfk-jr-debate-peter-hotez-elon-musk/

    Lots of people talk a lot of crap just like you, but they cower once they are asked to debate RFK jr., even for $100,000.00
    Richard Dawkins was asked why he doesn't debate creationists. His answer was that doing so is as silly as debating a flat-earther. Dawkins said giving creationists a debate with real scientists gives them status, as if this is really a topic to debate.

    I can't speak for Hotez but I can only guess he feels the same. The evidence for vaccines is so strong that it's a waste of time to debate people who have their minds already made up to ignore decades of exhaustive, peer-reviewed medical research.
  7. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    18 Jun '23 06:11
    @vivify

    He’s afraid of a public debate, because he knows he’s wrong
    — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 17, 2023
  8. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    19 Jun '23 23:16
    @vivify said
    Richard Dawkins was asked why he doesn't debate creationists. His answer was that doing so is as silly as debating a flat-earther. Dawkins said giving creationists a debate with real scientists gives them status, as if this is really a topic to debate.

    I can't speak for Hotez but I can only guess he feels the same. The evidence for vaccines is so strong that it's a was ...[text shortened]... ho have their minds already made up to ignore decades of exhaustive, peer-reviewed medical research.
    That is because there is nothing to debate with a creationist. Their position is simple, "god created everything". Hardly complicated. Creationists do not have any evidence, just faith. RFK jr. has evidence.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/if-vaccines-dont-cause-autism-then-how-do-you-explain-all-this-evidence/5822765
  9. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9544
    19 Jun '23 23:52
    @metal-brain said
    That is because there is nothing to debate with a creationist. Their position is simple, "god created everything". Hardly complicated. Creationists do not have any evidence, just faith. RFK jr. has evidence.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/if-vaccines-dont-cause-autism-then-how-do-you-explain-all-this-evidence/5822765
    Why isn't there any difference in the rates of autism in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated people?
  10. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    20 Jun '23 00:171 edit
    @wildgrass said
    Why isn't there any difference in the rates of autism in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated people?
    There is a difference.

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/exposing-truth/fully-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated/

    https://howdovaccinescauseautism.org/

    https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/214-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link
  11. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    24 Jun '23 03:37
    @wildgrass said
    Why isn't there any difference in the rates of autism in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated people?
    You had the evidence in the link you ignored from GR. It was from Steve Kirsch's substack.

    https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-vaccines-dont-cause-autism-then?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
  12. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    30 Jun '23 06:49
    @soothfast said
    Vaccines must undergo rigorous testing and several stages of successful clinical trials before being approved by the FDA for use. Same in the UK. Same in Germany. Same in France, and so on. That's the incentive for vaccine developers and manufacturers to make reasonably safe vaccines.

    Under these conditions, to also subject vaccine developers to the whims of j ...[text shortened]... romise. With you it's all or nothing, whereas in reality life is imperfect and risk always present.
    STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION!

    Vaccines are not required to be tested with a placebo control group. Do you know why? Because they say it is unethical.

    https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/01/no-us-childhood-vaccines-were-placebo-tested-why-the-pharmagovernment-complex-is-getting-desperate-to-shut-down-the-web.html
  13. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    30 Jun '23 06:54
    @wildgrass said
    Why isn't there any difference in the rates of autism in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated people?
    STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION!
    Vaccines are not required to be tested with a placebo control group. Do you know why? Because they claim it is unethical.

    https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/01/no-us-childhood-vaccines-were-placebo-tested-why-the-pharmagovernment-complex-is-getting-desperate-to-shut-down-the-web.html

    I never took the Chicken Pox vaccine and I got it when I was a child and did just fine.
    I don't think it is unethical to allow some children to get chicken pox. The UK does not even allow the chicken pox vaccine. Guess why?
  14. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87542
    30 Jun '23 07:06
    @metal-brain said
    STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION!
    Vaccines are not required to be tested with a placebo control group. Do you know why? Because they claim it is unethical.

    https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/01/no-us-childhood-vaccines-were-placebo-tested-why-the-pharmagovernment-complex-is-getting-desperate-to-shut-down-the-web.html

    I never took the Chicken Pox vaccine and I got it whe ...[text shortened]... low some children to get chicken pox. The UK does not even allow the chicken pox vaccine. Guess why?
    Lots of countries don’t give chickenpox vaccine, sunshine.

    It’s not a serious condition.
  15. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    30 Jun '23 08:09
    @shavixmir said
    Lots of countries don’t give chickenpox vaccine, sunshine.

    It’s not a serious condition.
    Exactly!
    So why no placebo controlled testing?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree