@no1marauder said
I suppose you missed or simply ignored my posts on page 6 which showed the British security forces created, supplied and give intelligence to the largest Loyalist paramilitary force in their murder campaign against Catholic civilians.
I suppose you missed or simply ignored my post showing that the UK government knew that by sending troops they were taking sides with th ...[text shortened]... quiry concluded."
https://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/06/15/uk.bloody.sunday.inquiry/index.html
No Not at all I saw a lot of grand claims, hearsay and assumptions in your posts on this subject but very little evidence that PIRA were not by their actions carrying out a terrorist campaign or have you forgotten your initial stated aim of proving that PIRA were not a terrorist organisation and are now settling for a Brit bashing thread.
I think you’ll find that they also colluded with nationalist terrorist groups as well, just the same as the Garda colluded with PIRA in covering up their murders of civilians. Once you begin a terrorist campaign you create the environment for some very murky dealings on all sides.
I’ve told you the history of the origins of the troubles which you’ve obviously ignored. The British didn’t have to send troops to NI any more than the US would have to send to troops Texas because they were already there just as they are in Colchester and Aldershot. This fantastical invasion story your trying to weave appears ridiculous to people like myself who watched the troubles unfold in real time, it simply shows your complete ignorance of the actual events. What began as a peaceful and justified civil rights movement against systemic anti catholic bigotry in the late sixties was seized upon and manipulated by men of violence on both sides to the point of civil war and at that point the British Government sent in extra troops to stifle the conflict. The Loyalist terrorist were no more happy about that than Nationalist ones, in fact it served PIRAs ends better than anyone’s.
“ ""British paratroopers on that day had no reason to believe they were under threat from the victims, gave no warnings before firing, and lied to the far-reaching official inquiry into the seminal event, the inquiry concluded.".
Not sure who you think has been defending the actions of individual members of the Parachute Regiment on Bloody Sunday, I don’t think they should have been anywhere near a rioting civilian population in the first place. clearly you haven’t bothered to read my posts on the subject, but lumping the whole of the British Army into that category won’t wash with me even if it suits your PIRA apologist mind set.
I have never claimed that the British State and it’s Army came out of the Troubles with any glory but if you could remember that almost all terrorists have just causes and all of them rely on heavy handed over reactions by the conventional forces that oppose them we might be able to drag the debate away from your rose tinted view of PIRA
And what about the treatment of the Catholic Nationalist community whose members were beaten, shot, vanquished and ultimately murdered by PIRAs ‘Administration’ squads? Who do think they saw as the blood soaked oppressors of their community?
Any atrocities committed by the Army are well documented but some relatives are still looking for the bodies of PIRAs victims and even to this day they are only taking responsibility for those acts that the evidence compels them to confront.
I hesitate to accuse anyone of dishonesty in these forums but I find the blind naivety that you display when it comes to PIRA and their terrorist activities suspiciously unfathomable.
When you said you were not going to answer my post I never thought you’d take it this far.
I take it your not going to address any of the murders of civilians committed by PIRA in and out-with their host community.
You haven’t even begun to prove that a PIRA were not a terrorist organisation all your doing is highlighting how badly governments respond to terrorist campaigns as if nobody knew that.