@suzianne said
No. Just no.
The highest earners SHOULD pay the most. But when CEOs pay less than their secretaries do, then we have a problem.
There is a legal gem in the law, Sue Anne. Has to do with 'Duty of Care' from one person to another. An interesting concept, which I bring up because a lot of your posts all seem to suggest that such a duty is owed that is really not owed at all.
If she works at a job (that she asked for,,,,,,(she did not ask a poor person for a job) that she is unhappy with, or has a rich boss that is folliowing the tax laws, she can probably find an even better job. Or start a company, like the young lady who founded Spandex, now a billionaire.
What would the secretary have us do with Spandex billionaire, Suzy? Does she have a duty of care to people who asked to work for her? What duty?
As to the CEO 'not paying enough taxes", how much more do you think he should pay? We have asked time and time again, what is 'fair share', but none ever answer. One reason they their % is lower than secretaruy is that they shelter their income, and they also invest their income (more jobs for your Uncle Mo and everyone!!). By shelter, I mean they will buy tax free bonds (paying 5.5% right now, tax free,) and theoretcially live on that 5.5%....which means they pay NO taxes. So, what would you do about THAT? Get rid of tax free municipals?
Why be disingenuous....could you respond to this, like, like, dialogue?
Whew.