@kellyjay saidAssuming what we think we "know" about him isn't simply the description of a composite figure [constructed decades after he died by writers with the aim of establishing a breakaway religion/cult of personality], I think he was probably nothing more or less than a radical Jewish rabbi who caused enough of a stir to result in him being executed by the Romans for sedition but not enough of a stir to cause anything to be written about him during his lifetime.
Matthew 16
Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” And they said, “Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”
Who do you say Jesus is?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 117373
24 Feb 20
@kellyjay saidI say he is not the same Jesus you speak about and who burns people alive because they failed to believe in him.
Who do you say Jesus is?
- Joined
- 23 Nov 09
- Moves
- 136849
@kellyjay saidA religeous fanatic like those we call terrorists these days.
Matthew 16
Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” And they said, “Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”
Who do you say Jesus is?
25 Feb 20
@kellyjay saidJesus is a main character in a popular Western religious tome. He may have been a man that actually lived on earth, or a fictional character invented by religious radicals of that time. (I have no strong opinion either way.)
Matthew 16
Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” And they said, “Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”
Who do you say Jesus is?
Many of his followers have their own personal and strict interpretation of the narrative of his life and teachings and doings. They tend to deny that this narrative is the result of an interpretation. Their narratives tend to clash with those of other followers. Each thinks their interpretation is the only right one, even though no two are completely alike.
@kegge saidThe politically passive figure at the centre of the "Jesus" story, if anything, undermined the "radical" Jewish "terrorists" who were constantly rebelling against Roman colonial rule. This was done by depicting him as a maverick - effectively diluting and reframing Judaism - rather than depicting him as a "fanatic".
A religeous fanatic like those we call terrorists these days.
26 Feb 20
@divegeester saidLike Kellyanne Conway (sonship) playing chess against Mike Pence (KellyJay).
KellyJay has taken cover in Sonship’s Cave of Adullam.
26 Feb 20
5 edits
@fmf saidIt is interesting that in the Biblical account of Jesus pretty much everyone ended up abandoning him to the cross as well.
Like Kellyanne Conway (sonship) playing chess against Mike Pence (KellyJay).
Just more brilliant chess players I reckon. Even Peter who disavowed him like you do now.
Some things never change.
But to his credit once Peter denied Christ and the rooster crowed he wept bitterly and later repented. You see, he loved him.
26 Feb 20
1 edit
@whodey said"Abandoned"? He cut off someone's ear attempting to prevent the arrest, for Christ's Sake! (not gonna lie; pun intended)
It is interesting that in the Biblical account of Jesus pretty much everyone ended up abandoning him to the cross as well.
Just more brilliant chess players I reckon. Even Peter who disavowed him like you do now.
Some things never change.
But to his credit once Peter denied Christ and the rooster crowed he wept bitterly and later repented. You see, he loved him.
27 Feb 20
@whodey saidWho Jesus actually was and how he was depicted - in texts written decades and decades after he was executed for sedition - are most likely different things, at least to my non-superstitious way of thinking.
It is interesting that in the Biblical account of Jesus pretty much everyone ended up abandoning him to the cross as well.
Just more brilliant chess players I reckon. Even Peter who disavowed him like you do now.
Some things never change.
But to his credit once Peter denied Christ and the rooster crowed he wept bitterly and later repented. You see, he loved him.
You have meagre evidence of what "Peter" actually said or did thirty or forty years before people seeking to create a religion sat down and started conjuring up a story.