The Health Risks of Gay Sex

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sigh, its not about me, just saying, i did not write the report, the health risks of gay sex. I have already answered why i am interested in the subject, in that it corroborates my religious beliefs in that homosexuality is unnatural and contains inherent health risks, you need not acquiesce. Obesity is rarely, if ever portrayed as healthy, can we say the same thing about the gay lifestyle, i dont think so.

Your views and religious beliefs concerning gay men are not about you? 😞

Yet again we're at a place where you need to focus on negativity to corroborate your religious beliefs. Curious mindset.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
he holds that both are morally unacceptable is not to state that one cannot logically distinguish between the two, it is merely to state that both are unacceptable. again it is not evidence that he has demonstrated any hatred nor animosity towards homosexuals themselves.

Do you think Diggs feels "any hatred [or] animosity towards" adults who rape children? I do. I am sure you do too. Does Diggs too, do you think?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Your views and religious beliefs concerning gay men are not about you? 😞

Yet again we're at a place where you need to focus on negativity to corroborate your religious beliefs. Curious mindset.

whut? I thought you were at a spa? Negativity? so you like to view harmful practices as positive, biazzaro! If something is contrary to nature, its contrary to nature, Bible is vindicated once again!

Originally posted by FMF
Do you think Diggs feels "any hatred [or] animosity towards" adults who rape children? I do. I am sure you do too. Does Diggs too, do you think?

I have absolutely no idea what Doctor Diggs feels, if he produces some research on the subject, ill let you know.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
"2) He has not implied anything of the sort, the study was cited simply as an instance of its occurrence among homosexuals, the fact that it was some time ago, gathered under unusual circumstances has no bearing on the fact that it returned a percentage of 22, there were other studies which showed similar result, which i myself personally cited. "[/b return of 22% be accepted as the usual behavior of a group? of course the answer is no.

why not, are you saying that the return was not 22 percent, no? well, then, shut-up-o -ya-face!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I have absolutely no idea what Doctor Diggs feels, if he produces some research on the subject, ill let you know.

I don't think he's going to do research into whether or not he feels "any hatred [or] animosity towards" adults who have sex with minors? You would need him to do that before you felt you had a measure of man in the case of Diggs' and his attitude to paedophilia?

Can you say you feel "any hatred [or] animosity towards" adults who rape children? I can say so that I do without reservation. Can you say you do?

Originally posted by FMF
I don't think he's going to do research into whether or not he feels "any hatred [or] animosity towards" adults who have sex with minors? You would need him to do that before you felt you had a measure of man in the case of Diggs' and his attitude to paedophilia?

Can you say you feel "any hatred [or] animosity towards" adults who rape children? I can say so that I do without reservation. Can you say you do?

One gain this thread is not about me, its about Dr. Diggs and his published material on the harmful practices of homosexual sex. Sigh, i would be pleased if you remember that.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why not, are you saying that the return was not 22 percent, no? well, then, shut-up-o -ya-face!

Empirically speaking, if the data is gathered in unusual circumstances the figure of 22% cannot be accepted as reflecting the usual behavior of the group in question. The "22%" has no more validity that the '18% of gays rape their own children' statistic from that web site you cited.

Originally posted by FMF
Empirically speaking, if the data is gathered in unusual circumstances the figure of 22% cannot be accepted as reflecting the usual behavior of the group in question. The "22%" has no more validity that the '18% of gays rape their own children' statistic from that web site you cited.

then take the matter up with those persons who produced the data.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
whut? I thought you were at a spa? Negativity? so you like to view harmful practices as positive, biazzaro! If something is contrary to nature, its contrary to nature, Bible is vindicated once again!

I went to a Spa for a night. I'm back.

I don't view harmful practices as positive, didn't even imply that. I'm noting that again you are seeking out that which is negative, in this case high numbers of HIV infections, to corroborate you religious beliefs.

Another question, if anal sex is such an abomination and contrary to nature as you claim, how can people derive such pleasure from it? Why did God let that happen?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
One gain this thread is not about me, its about Dr. Diggs and his published material on the harmful practices of homosexual sex. Sigh, i would be pleased if you remember that.

For a moralizer, it's odd that you cannot state whether you feel "any hatred [or] animosity towards" adults who rape children? On a thread a few months ago you blurted out that [if it were up to you, which it isn't] you'd want to hang them by their testicles or castrate them or some such, as you will remember. But here you are unable to say anything unequivocal about child rapists. on the other hand, I can. I undoubtedly feel "hatred and animosity" towards child rapists. It's odd that you can't just say the same. And it's odd that you place so much faith in Diggs when you claim you 'have absolutely no idea what Doctor Diggs feels" about adults raping children.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
then take the matter up with those persons who produced the data.

Well I have taken it up with you because it is you who is attempting to use it to back your personal opinions on this subject.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I went to a Spa for a night. I'm back.

I don't view harmful practices as positive, didn't even imply that. I'm noting that again you are seeking out that which is negative, in this case high numbers of HIV infections, to corroborate you religious beliefs.

Another question, if anal sex is such an abomination and contrary to nature as you claim, how can people derive such pleasure from it? Why did God let that happen?

people derive pleasure from intravenously injecting opiates, pleasure has never been a particularly strong justification for morally questionable practices.

Originally posted by FMF
Well I have taken it up with you because it is you who is attempting to use it to back your personal opinions on this subject.

nope, i did not produce the data, i did not write the Bible, will you please leave me out of it, or you will risk being struck out again!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why not, are you saying that the return was not 22 percent, no? well, then, shut-up-o -ya-face!

You often talk about 'empirical methods'. Do you contend that if data is gathered in unusual circumstances it can nevertheless be accepted as reflecting the usual behavior of the group being researched? Sounds fundamentally flawed in terms of methodology to me.