The City of water

@sonship said
@divegeester

If they were sonship’s “own” metaphors, there would at least be some minor credit for imagination.

Sonship didn't invent the phrase "City of water."

@FMF

When you say you "don't know", on reflection, would you concede that saying that was a falsehood?

@sonship said
Divegeesster, where does you Unitarian theology see as a final conclusion of your God's work ?
Come on in, the water's fine.

You don't need atheist FMF to clue you.

@divegeester

I don’t understand the question, especially in the context of the topic. Secondly I don’t identify as a Unitarian.

@sonship said
@FMF

When you say you "don't know", on reflection, would you concede that saying that was a falsehood?

Take that issue to "Thou Shalt Not Repeat Others ??".

Man up to the questions asked you about your belief in where the world and humanity is headed.

I know its much more fun for you to sit back and point out holes in a Christian's consis ...[text shortened]... OUR OWN expectations and visions for the future of humanity and the world are _____________________?

@sonship said
@divegeester

I don’t understand the question, especially in the context of the topic. Secondly I don’t identify as a Unitarian.

I think you mean that you do not necessarily subscribe to everything written on a statement by a Unitarian Church.
Funny though, you assume I would subscribe to everything self identifying as Trinitarian.

Anyway, what is yo ...[text shortened]... nything particular or just a meandering around in miscellaneous acts of benevolence?

Educate me.

@sonship said
What is your expected grand finale of the world history ?

Notice folks. How many questioning posts will it take to get Divegeester and FMF to "understand" what it is I am asking?

I'll be back in a few hours to see which one of them has the courage to speak their beliefs about where the world is going and what, if any, is a outcome of history or Evolution or what-have-you?

If they take another 30 posts to swear that they don't understand the question, maybe they just have no expectations, hopes, fears, visions of a future world at all.

That's Ok. But why whine that the Bible believer does according to the climax of the Bible ? - a City of the water of eternal life - a City of water - New Jerusalem (Rev. 21,22).

You guys wouldn't be afraid of a little skepticism, would you ??

@sonship said
I didn't invent the phrase "City of water".

@FMF replied
Who did

@sonship replied
I don't know.

FMF said:
When you say you "don't know", on reflection, would you concede that saying that was a falsehood?

Sonship didn’t answer the question...

I bet you didn't even send in that complaint of old with the P.O. Box. Remember? Complaining about the pamphlet "The Beliefs and Practices of the Local Churches" All that stuff about the trinity and salvation ?

I thought you graduated from whining to threats of action.
Empty pretentious threats ??

Where do your Unitarian concepts of God's activity reveal to you history is going ?

@sonship said
Notice folks. How many questioning posts will it take to get Divegeester and FMF to "understand" what it is I am asking?

I'll be back in a few hours to see which one of them has the courage to speak their beliefs about where the world is going and what, if any, is a outcome of history or Evolution or what-have-you?

If they take another 30 posts to swear that they do ...[text shortened]... ew Jerusalem[/b] (Rev. 21,22).

You guys wouldn't be afraid of a little skepticism, would you ??

@FMF

You may believe in some "grand finale" or "climax" to human history, sonship, and you may have some "expectations" about such a "climax", but that doesn't mean I do.

@sonship said
maybe they just have no expectations, hopes, fears, visions of a future world at all.

@FMF

You may believe in some "grand finale" or "climax" to human history, sonship, and you may have some "expectations" about such a "climax", but that doesn't mean I do.

@sonship said
Splendidly vague.