1 edit
Originally posted by lemon limeI don't see the relevance of this. If I asked you about who you think does and doesn't go to heaven, what of it?
Yes FMF, I know the question dive was referring to... because it's the [b]same question he's been asking and refusing to acknowledge whenever it's answered. But aren't you going to call me liar and say the example I gave about JW and Catholics in heaven never happened? It started with you asking me if I thought Catholics will go to heaven...
Do you remember this, or do you think I'm lying?
Originally posted by lemon limeMy question was addressed to you and is about your posting. It's not addressed to divegeester.
I'm waiting to see what your boyfriend has to say about this. He can deflect and evade without your help... or maybe he can't, but let's just wait and see, shall we?
Originally posted by lemon limeThe question is whether the supposed torture of those who are not "saved" is eternal, or if those who are not "saved" are destroyed.
Okay, I'll bite... what question?
From what I can make out, your stance on this question ~ since page 46 of this thread ~ is now "I don't know". Have I understood you correctly?
1 edit
Originally posted by lemon limeSo? I have asked you a question which seeks to ascertain why it is you tackle divegeester and yet do not tackle some of the other combative Christians here.
Yes, but [b]my posting was addressed to divegeester. It wasn't addressed to you.[/b]
Originally posted by FMFHave you tried looking at pages 1 through 45, or are they no longer relevant to this 'discussion'?
The question is whether the supposed torture of those who are not "saved" is eternal, or if those who are not "saved" are destroyed.
From what I can make out, your stance on this question ~ since page 46 of this thread ~ is now [b]"I don't know". Have I understood you correctly?[/b]
Originally posted by lemon limeThis is just a dodge on your part. When I did look through pages 1 to 45 and asked you eleven specific questions, quoting you verbatim every single time, you dodged that as well.
Have you tried looking at pages 1 through 45, or are they no longer relevant to this 'discussion'?
Originally posted by FMFWhat gives you the right to ask and demand answers of anyone?
This is just a dodge on your part. When I did look through pages 1 to 45 and asked you eleven specific questions, quoting you verbatim every single time, you dodged that as well.
Why should anyone answer any of your questions when you won't answer theirs?
Do you remember asking me if I thought there will be Catholics in heaven? Yes or no?
Do you remember what my answer to that question was? Yes or no?
Do you think this actually happened, or do you think I'm lying to you about it? Yes or not?
Originally posted by lemon limeSure, we talked about that. But what of it? It isn't relevant here. The question now, here, on this thread, on this topic, is: Since page 46 of this thread, your answer to the question 'Is the supposed torture of those who are not "saved" eternal, or are they destroyed?' has been "I don't know", yes or no?
Do you remember asking me if I thought there will be Catholics in heaven? Yes or no?
Do you remember what my answer to that question was? Yes or no?
Do you think this actually happened, or do you think I'm lying to you about it? Yes or not?
Originally posted by lemon limeWell he's a Christian for sure. Is he a combative poster? He can be. But you are too. You dish out more ad hominems than divegeester, clearly. Suzianne is a combative poster, more so than anyone perhaps. And so is RJHinds. And josephw. Rajk999 can be combative. And Grampy Bobby at times too although he prefers passive aggressive tactics. And there's whodey. And KellyJay. And robbie carrobie and galveston75 and roigam. And there are others. All of them Christians.
Do you think divegeester is a combative Christian?