@pb1022 saidIt's a rough world out there. You can interpret “In everything, do to others what you would have them do to you” as you see fit.
If I did something bad toward someone, I would expect them to do something bad to me in return.Therefore if someone does something bad to me, I could justify doing something bad to them.
The much more challenging teaching is to love your enemies and not repay evil with evil but overcome evil with good.
02 Jan 22
@fmf saidYou must dispute the authorship of the Gospel of John, which is the Gospel that seems to have the most supernatural statements from Jesus in it (as well as claims of His deity.)
I think everything attributed to him was written by people decades after his death. Many of them were probably sincere.
02 Jan 22
@fmf saidYou must also dispute authorship of the writings of the Apostle Paul, who wrote most of the New Testament and who claimed to have an encounter with the Resurrected Christ on the Road to Damascus?
I think everything attributed to him was written by people decades after his death. Many of them were probably sincere.
And that encounter caused Paul to do a 180 and change from being one of the worst persecutors of early Christians to being one of their greatest advocates and defenders.
On what basis do you dispute that the Apostle John wrote the Gospel of John and 1 John and on what basis do you dispute that the Apostle Paul wrote all of those epistles to churches?
@pb1022 saidI am not a Christian and I believe we can only speculate about supernatural things. Such speculation is part and parcel of the human condition and, to tie this back to the OP, I think basing theological narratives on the aspirations that such speculation fosters ~ things like the "deduction" that we are immortal ~ is part and parcel of the human condition as well.
You must dispute the authorship of the Gospel of John, which is the Gospel that seems to have the most supernatural statements from Jesus in it (as well as claims of His deity.)
02 Jan 22
@fmf saidBut the person who thought of it is certainly due credit, no? And you didn’t really answer my question as to whether you think all the supernatural statements and actions attributed to Jesus were fabricated by writers.
As I said, a principle like “...in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you” is persuasive regardless of who thought of it.
@pb1022 saidAs I said, I am sure some of them or many of them, even, were sincere in their belief that what they were writing was not a fabrication.
And you didn’t really answer my question as to whether you think all the supernatural statements and actions attributed to Jesus were fabricated by writers.
02 Jan 22
@fmf saidI don’t think you have to be a Christian to have an opinion on who Jesus Christ was/is.
I am not a Christian and I believe we can only speculate about supernatural things. Such speculation is part and parcel of the human condition and, to tie this back to the OP, I think basing theological narratives on the aspirations that such speculation fosters ~ things like the "deduction" that we are immortal ~ is part and parcel of the human condition as well.
If I’m understanding you correctly, you think He was a good teacher and wise man and anything supernatural that was attributed to Him was fabricated by writers of the New Testament.
I’m not sure yet on what basis you make that claim of fabrication.
02 Jan 22
@fmf saidBut in the case of the Apostle John and the Apostle Peter and the Apostle Paul, these are eyewitnesses. So it’s not, in your view, that they were sincere in what they wrote; they must have been lying. Isn’t that right?
As I said, I am sure some of them or many of them, even, were sincere in their belief that what they were writing was not a fabrication.
If I say I saw something I didn’t see, I’m lying, aren’t I?
@pb1022 saidSome of the ideas attributed to him resonate and probably, in part, explain the success of the cult of personality [and identity] that was centred on him decades after he died.
If I’m understanding you correctly, you think He was a good teacher and wise man and anything supernatural that was attributed to Him was fabricated by writers of the New Testament.
@pb1022 saidI have no way of knowing if they were eye-witnesses or not.
But in the case of the Apostle John and the Apostle Peter and the Apostle Paul, these are eyewitnesses. So it’s not, in your view, that they were sincere in what they wrote; they must have been lying. Isn’t that right?
02 Jan 22
@pb1022 saidThe texts probably resulted from decades of 'chinese whispers' passed on by all manner of people and groups, and sub-groups, all in many respects in competition with each other; dozens of other supposedly 'eye witness accounts' rejected; nothing finalized until literally hundreds of years later, when corporate Christianity had finally finessed its fastidiously assembled text.
I’m not sure yet on what basis you make that claim of fabrication.
02 Jan 22
@fmf saidWell they said they were eyewitnesses. So they were either eyewitnesses or they’re liars.
I have no way of knowing if they were eye-witnesses or not.
“That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;
(For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us😉”
(1 John 1:1-2)
“Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:
After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.
After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles.
And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time.
For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.”
(1 Corinthians 15:1-9)
“For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.”
(2 Peter 1:16)