Originally posted by divegeester to Rajk999You perhaps need to make a case that the "one part only", that you say Rajk999 overly emphasizes, is not, in fact, the most important teaching the Bible has about living a Christian life, rather than for you to speak of your preference for an interpretation that allows you to declare that you are "saved" even though you acknowledge that you "live a desert life [... and...] feed on the carcasses, the decaying carrion of the bygone dispensations of grace".
Rajk999 will not do this becused he has nothing to give, no hope, no experiences about how his teaching here is applied in his life, how it works, his failures. He cannot, because he doesn't speak the gospel he speaks part of it. One part only, one axe that he grinds.
-Removed-sonship's ideology ~ his torturer god ideas and self-enraptured spam-bombing verbosity aside ~ suits the reality (about yourself) that you describe. Rajk999's ideology is less accommodating/convenient ~ sonship offers the 'done deal/saved/no matter what' interpretation. The way I see it, the thinking v doing dichotomy is a fundamental dispute about what "a Christian life" actually means, and this dichotomy plays itself out most clearly in the dialogues between sonship and Rajk999.
1 edit
-Removed-...the thousands and thousands of posts I've made attacking sonship's errors and horrible teachings
Like me, you have nothing to fear from sonship's torturer god philosophy. But we have different reasons. In my case because it is just nonsense that doesn't make any moral sense ~ it just isn't real to me. In your case you have nothing to fear from it because [1] you think it is an error and [2] you believe you are "saved", you can't/won't be tortured anyway (if it were to be true, for instance) and sonship's OSAS theology offers you this. Your principled confronting sonship on his ghastly notions notwithstanding, at the very core of his 'teaching' is the 'We are but dirty rags but it's OK, just have faith' thing that appeals to you.
