Let's get back on topic, shall we?
"Moonbus wanted to know if I knew anything about Mormon beliefs so I started this thread."
When I asked whether you had read the BoM, I wasn't really interested in your opinions about the doctrinal differences between Mormonism and whatever brand of Christianity it is that you subscribe to. I was more interested in what you think about the manner in which the BoM came to be and whether you think there is any truth to the claims that Joseph Smith was visited by an angel, whether he really did find golden tablets inscribed in an unknown language, whether an angel really did help him to translate the tablets into English, and whether those words are really the words of God.
Clearly, you don't believe that those words are the words of God, since they conflict with what it says in the Bible. That is how I understand your thread title, "CONFLICT." So, for you, apparently, it does reduce to doctrinal differences after all: any doctrine which conflicts with what you take to be the word of God must be false religion. From which, presumably, you must assume that Joseph Smith's epiphany was delusional or he flat out lied about it, there was no angel, there were no golden tablets inscribed in an unknown language. The whole chain falls apart if the one crucial link is broken, is that how you see it?