Spirituality
10 Jul 14
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by RJHindsBut you were asked if he had followed the teachings of Jehovahs Witnesses would he have killed those innocent women and children at Sand Creek?
Well, apparently he must not have followed the teachings of the Methodists either or he would not have been "thrown out" by them.
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieFirst of all, I am not a Methodist.
You are a Methodist, right? what do you think of the Methodist preacher John Chivington who slaughtered innocent women and children at the massacre of Sand Creek? Was he a real Christian? What Methodist doctrines was he following? If he had been a Jehovahs Witness and followed the teachings of Jehovahs Witnesses would he have slaughtered innocent ...[text shortened]... better look at the rafter in your own church before you start pointing out the straws in others.
Secondly, I have ancestors who were Cheyenne.
You insult me mightily, and you embarrass yourself.
You don't know when to stop, do you?
Is behavior like this what you consider being a "real" Christian? Heaven help you.
Originally posted by SuzianneJust answer the question and the fact that you claim Cheyenne decent is irrelevant, the question is not about you nor your megalomania its about whether the Methodist minister was a real Christian and as far as i can remember you stated previously that you were a Methodist, or has your faith conveniently waned in light of the above.
First of all, I am not a Methodist.
Secondly, I have ancestors who were Cheyenne.
You insult me mightily, and you embarrass yourself.
You don't know when to stop, do you?
Is behavior like this what you consider being a "real" Christian? Heaven help you.
So if he had followed the teachings of Jehovahs witnesses would he have killed those innocent women and children? lets see if you have the honesty and integrity to answer?
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat does it matter, since he did not follow the Methodist teachings? You can't therefore prove Jehovah's Witnesses teachings are better than Methodist teachings.
But you were asked if he had followed the teachings of Jehovahs Witnesses would he have killed those innocent women and children at Sand Creek?
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by RJHindsI am not trying to prove they are better, the question is, if he had followed the teachings of Jehovahs Witnesses would he have killed those innocent women and children.
What does it matter, since he did not follow the Methodist teachings? You can't therefore prove Jehovah's Witnesses teachings are better than Methodist teachings.
19 Jul 14
2 edits
Originally posted by DeepThoughtNo i doubt you could read Urdu, Farsi (Persian) or Arabic because it uses a different script. Nastaʿlīq. I doubt you could read Chinese either as its pictorial.
I can read all languages, haven't the faintest idea what it means with most of them though.
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf you are the "shining example" of what JW teaching is about, then there is absolutely no telling what he'd do, just as no one here can tell just what ridiculous crap you're going to spew next.
I am not trying to prove they are better, the question is, if he had followed the teachings of Jehovahs Witnesses would he have killed those innocent women and children.
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAfter your insults, I'm not going to give you the time of day.
Just answer the question and the fact that you claim Cheyenne decent is irrelevant, the question is not about you nor your megalomania its about whether the Methodist minister was a real Christian and as far as i can remember you stated previously that you were a Methodist, or has your faith conveniently waned in light of the above.
So if he had ...[text shortened]... led those innocent women and children? lets see if you have the honesty and integrity to answer?
Take your rudeness elsewhere and leave me alone.
You might think you'd know a real Christian, or even that you are one, but Jesus himself certainly wouldn't know you.
19 Jul 14
2 edits
Originally posted by SuzianneJust as i figured you have neither the honesty nor the integrity to answer, Adios! I don't think we shall be asking you any further questions on what makes a real Christian.
After your insults, I'm not going to give you the time of day.
Take your rudeness elsewhere and leave me alone.
You might think you'd know a real Christian, or even that you are one, but Jesus himself certainly wouldn't know you.
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by SuzianneStill dishing it out but refusing to take it, oh dear, you do realise that these posts you are making are more a reflection of you than the people you seek to vilify and you a 'Real Christian', as well, the shame of it.
If you are the "shining example" of what JW teaching is about, then there is absolutely no telling what he'd do, just as no one here can tell just what ridiculous crap you're going to spew next.
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell my honest answer is that if he had been a Jehovah's Witness that more white settlers would have been scalped and murdered by the Indians, because he would not have tried to stop or fought against them.
Oh dear, third time asking and you could not muster either the honesty or the integrity to answer yet when you are dishing it out you can hardly shut up.
19 Jul 14
Originally posted by RJHindsYeah Ron, just get out your guns and kill them all. Right? Of course you would have.......
Well my honest answer is that if he had been a Jehovah's Witness that more white settlers would have been scalped and murdered by the Indians, because he would not have tried to stop or fought against them.