Originally posted by robbie carrobie
A confession at last!

Divesgeester a deadly accurate portrayal by GB - hypersensitive to his own sensibilities and insensitive toward the sensibilities of other people! WOW!

Is slimming a taboo topic in the US? Surely not?

Originally posted by FMF
What do you make of Grampy Bobby's suggestion that the OP is "offensive"?

Originally posted by FMF
Is slimming a taboo topic in the US? Surely not?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
the real question is why are divegeesters sensibilities more important than other peoples sensibilities? He thinks they are, do you?

Originally posted by divegeester
Perhaps I am, who knows...and so what about it?

You and Grampy Bobby are pompous, arrogant, abusive blowhards, but nobody seems to care much.

Originally posted by FMF
Why don't you start a thread about it?.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"Forum Guidelines: •Discussions in forums can often get heated, but while you may take issue with another poster's viewpoint, you must not resort to personal attacks or abuse. Do not post offensive or inflammatory remarks that stray beyond the bounds of reasoned debate. Calling another poster an "idiot" will leave a post subject to immediate removal." Help : forumguide

Originally posted by FMF
This copy paste clearly isn't something you apply to your self-professed supporters.

Are you not willing to discuss your contention that the OP is "offensive"?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Why don't you just tell me? surely it will only take a post?

divesgeesters own sensibilities are more important than the sensibilities of other people because. . . . . .

Originally posted by FMF
I don't think so no. I think you might be conflating opinions with sensibilities. Grampy Bobby has only brought "sensibilities" up because he disapproves of and disagrees with divegeester's opinions and he would never brandish his 'sensibilities analysis' against anyone he approved of, even if they were boorish and facile.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
@Crowley

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No i dint think I am, 'conflating opinions with sensibilities'. Divesgeester when asked, 'why he was hypersensitive to his own sensibilities and insensitive to the sensibilities of others', did not deny the charge. This leaves the discerning reader with the question why his sensibilities should be considered as paramount. Is he a megalomaniac? a sociopath? surely there must be some reason?

Originally posted by FMF
Is who a megalomaniac or a sociopath? divegeester? No. Why? Do you think he is?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I am only surmising. It could be something as benign as a lack of modesty or lack of empathy towards others. Personally I think its a spiritual problem.