You have not No1, it fails to address that children can be harmed in other ways than physically, they do not have the capacity to understand what is happening and they do not have the ability to remove themselves from the situation. In my first post I fully admitted to not knowing where the line is and that I usually avoid the age of consent ...[text shortened]... al, what they do is immoral and despicable and those that fail to condemn them are in the same boat.
Creatures indeed. All you libs 'go for it' with the creatures. Life has always been the same for me. Note that y'all were not like this when you were 'growing up'. Something changed for you. What was it?
@averagejoe1said Creatures indeed. All you libs 'go for it' with the creatures. Life has always been the same for me. Note that y'all were not like this when you were 'growing up'. Something changed for you. What was it?
"Something changed for you. What was it?"
It was no longer illegal and liable to get you killed. Now it's just liable to get you killed.
When I was about ten the neighbor hired a couple of topless girls and a guy in a Speedo to dance out in the street for a block party. My friends were hiding but nobody told them they had to. I was sitting front and center
@averagejoe1said Could you rephrase? Not the prick part.
Some of the human beings you call creatures (because you're a hateful prick but i think you understood that) only appear to be more of nowadays. The truth is they were always there, it was just illegal for them to be themselves. So they hid.
Nowadays they hope people tolerate them more so they reveal themselves more often, feeling safer. Sadly, in more backwards regions that is still not true. They make the mistake of hoping some americans are decent human beings when in fact they are just hate bags of puss and manure.
They haven't multiplied, you hateful pricks just aren't dying fast enough before infecting others with your hate.
@zahlanzisaid Some of the human beings you call creatures (because you're a hateful prick but i think you understood that) only appear to be more of nowadays. The truth is they were always there, it was just illegal for them to be themselves. So they hid.
Nowadays they hope people tolerate them more so they reveal themselves more often, feeling safer. Sadly, in more backwards regions t ...[text shortened]... multiplied, you hateful pricks just aren't dying fast enough before infecting others with your hate.
@athousandyoungsaid When I was about ten the neighbor hired a couple of topless girls and a guy in a Speedo to dance out in the street for a block party. My friends were hiding but nobody told them they had to. I was sitting front and center
Here’s another bible story, you’re holding back on me😉.
@jj-adamssaid Still think these shows are wholesome and harmless?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/drag-queen-straddles-girl-north-211653395.html
I guess it's pointless to highlight how lame-brained it is to take a single incident and parlay it into an exhortation to ban all public drag queen shows (or whatever the hell it is you're advocating).
From what I gather, the vast majority of such shows are fairly humdrum: the drag queen reads in a library setting or the like, and that's about it.
What you advocate, logically, is the banning of practically any event that might involve an adult doing something "objectionable" in the presence of a child. If that does not feel right to you, it's because you're blinded by hatred on this one particular issue, and are therefore not fit to debate the matter constructively.
@soothfastsaid I guess it's pointless to highlight how lame-brained it is to take a single incident and parlay it into an exhortation to ban all public drag queen shows (or whatever the hell it is you're advocating).
From what I gather, the vast majority of such shows are fairly humdrum: the drag queen reads in a library setting or the like, and that's about it.
What you advocate, ...[text shortened]... hatred on this one particular issue, and are therefore not fit to debate the matter constructively.