Go back
Is this woke enough for you?

Is this woke enough for you?

Debates


@athousandyoung said
Because I want to know why you implicitly included me among the ‘woke’.

‘This point in the conversation’? It was two posts ago, not last year!
Never mind stupid.


@mike69 said
Never mind stupid.
Still a weasel I see


@jj-adams said
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you once say that all the crimes in upperclass parts of LA against rich people was just pay back for how evil America has been?
Sounds pretty woke to me.
You're wrong.


@athousandyoung said
Still a weasel I see
Pot calling kettle black stupid.


@mike69 said
Pot calling kettle black stupid.
I know you are but what am I?


@athousandyoung said
You're wrong.
NO I'M NOT I REMEMBER IT DISTINCTLY.
That's when I said I would no longer respond to your ridiculous claims.
That was a couple of my on-line personalities ago, but you said it to me and you were proud of it.
At least don't be such a punk and deny what you have said.


@athousandyoung said
I know you are but what am I?
Stupid


@jj-adams said
NO I'M NOT I REMEMBER IT DISTINCTLY.
That's when I said I would no longer respond to your ridiculous claims.
That was a couple of my on-line personalities ago, but you said it to me and you were proud of it.
At least don't be such a punk and deny what you have said.
You lied about responding to my posts. Why should anyone believe you now?


@athousandyoung said
You lied about responding to my posts. Why should anyone believe you now?
Stupid


This is the second thread now that's gone multiple pages discussing a term that no one seems interested in.


@mike69 said
Stupid
STFU Rain Man


@athousandyoung said
I'm referring to

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/bible-of-the-woke--what-would-it-look-like.196586
Thread 196586


@athousandyoung said
Because I want to know why you implicitly included me among the ‘woke’.

‘This point in the conversation’? It was two posts ago, not last year!
I don’t care what you want, we have started the process, just answer.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@jj-adams said
NO I'M NOT I REMEMBER IT DISTINCTLY.
That's when I said I would no longer respond to your ridiculous claims.
That was a couple of my on-line personalities ago, but you said it to me and you were proud of it.
At least don't be such a punk and deny what you have said.
"A couple of my online personalities ago..."

Is this the new normal?

Make complete asses of yourselves with your antiquated, racist opinions, and then just "reset", change your name, "no that wasn't me", instead of just being ostracized for stupid statements you've made. You people never expect to pay for your sins, do you? White privilege at its best.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@athousandyoung said
You lied about responding to my posts. Why should anyone believe you now?
I said I wasn't going to respond to you anymore, then changed my mind.
That's not lying.
And you DID say that crimes against the rich were OK.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.