BILL CLINTON Paid Paula Jones $850,000 hush $

NYT’s reports – Clinton Administration officials said a check for $850,000, the amount agreed to in November to settle the case, was being sent by overnight mail to Ms. Jones and her lawyers. The officials, who asked that their names not be used, said that a little more than half of the money, $475,000, came from an insurance policy against civil liability the President held with Chubb Group Insurance. Most, if not all, of the remainder, was withdrawn from a blind trust in the name of Mrs. Clinton, which officials said last year had assets of slightly more than $1 million.

A blind trust that is in Mr. Clinton’s name was reported in financial disclosure forms last year to have less than $100,000 in assets. A White House official said that although the trusts were in separate names, they were, in effect, joint accounts.

https://100percentfedup.com/president-bill-clinton-paid-paula-jones-850000-to-shut-up-about-sexual-harassment-charges-while-he-was-in-middle-of-impeachment-hearings-for-affair-with-19-yr-old-intern-why-was-he-never-arrested/

So, if Hillary Clinton only reported that she had less than $100,000 in assets, where did the additional $279,000+ come from? Does anyone even care?

https://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/13/us/clinton-settles-jones-lawsuit-with-a-check-for-850000.html

@Metal-Brain
Starting your Trump whataboutism defense early, eh. Trump is not supposed to be arrested till Tuesday.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Starting your Trump whataboutism defense early, eh. Trump is not supposed to be arrested till Tuesday.

What is he being arrested for?

HRC was not honest about funding the Steele dossier either. She reported it as "legal services" when it was opposition research which was used for Lawfare against Trump and Russia. She lied. Isn't that illegal?

Was she trying to cover up her role in Lawfare?

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Starting your Trump whataboutism defense early, eh. Trump is not supposed to be arrested till Tuesday.

Sonhouse, I think we would all like, after all your years of Trump Consumption, to tell us what the outcome will be (not should be).
And yes, please tell us exactly what this DA says Trump has done wrong, warranting prosecution. You will be the go-to guy on this. (We know the IRS investigation , but we are asking about any other stuff, if any). I fear that you will give us your opinions rather than facts.

@metal-brain said
So, if Hillary Clinton only reported that she had less than $100,000 in assets, where did the additional $279,000+ come from?

You misread your own OP:

"A blind trust that is in Mr. Clinton’s name was reported in financial disclosure forms last year to have less than $100,000".

That's "Mr." as in Bill, not Hillary. Where did the remainder come from? From your own OP:

"remainder, was withdrawn from a blind trust in the name of Mrs. Clinton, which officials said last year had assets of slightly more than $1 million."

In other words, this worthless thread was started because you lack reading comprehension.

@metal-brain said
What is he being arrested for?

HRC was not honest about funding the Steele dossier either. She reported it as "legal services" when it was opposition research which was used for Lawfare against Trump and Russia. She lied. Isn't that illegal?

Was she trying to cover up her role in Lawfare?

You lie here all the time.

Is that illegal?

What are you trying to cover up?

@vivify said
You misread your own OP:

"A blind trust that is in Mr. Clinton’s name was reported in financial disclosure forms last year to have less than $100,000".

That's "Mr." as in Bill, not Hillary. Where did the remainder come from? From your own OP:

"remainder, was withdrawn from a blind trust in the name of Mrs. Clinton, which officials said last year had as ...[text shortened]... n."[/b]

In other words, this worthless thread was started because you lack reading comprehension.

Was there mention of “joint accounts”? 🤔

@great-big-stees said
Was there mention of “joint accounts”? 🤔

Yes but I didn't want to spell that out for MB as well.

@suzianne said
You lie here all the time.

Is that illegal?

What are you trying to cover up?

Yes, it is illegal. That is why she had to pay a fine.

@metal-brain said
NYT’s reports – Clinton Administration officials said a check for $850,000, the amount agreed to in November to settle the case, was being sent by overnight mail to Ms. Jones and her lawyers. The officials, who asked that their names not be used, said that a little more than half of the money, $475,000, came from an insurance policy against civil liability the President h ...[text shortened]...

https://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/13/us/clinton-settles-jones-lawsuit-with-a-check-for-850000.html

Was it just prior to an election and did he use election funding to pay her off.

@kevcvs57 said
Was it just prior to an election and did he use election funding to pay her off.

No, it was just prior to his impeachment. How do you like that timing?

"did he use election funding to pay her off."

We don't know. That is the problem. Where did the extra money come from?

@metal-brain said
NYT’s reports – Clinton Administration officials said a check for $850,000, the amount agreed to in November to settle the case, was being sent by overnight mail to Ms. Jones and her lawyers. The officials, who asked that their names not be used, said that a little more than half of the money, $475,000, came from an insurance policy against civil liability the President h ...[text shortened]...

https://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/13/us/clinton-settles-jones-lawsuit-with-a-check-for-850000.html

Every banana republic that has engaged in political prosecutions have substantial numbers of gullible people who believe it's nothing but dispassionate enforcement of law.

People in Venezuela have had to resort to eating zoo animals for food, yet even today there are plenty of gullible people who trust that Hugo Chavez was doing the right thing to prosecute his opponents. (Hospitals in Venezuela are not legally allowed to list starvation as a cause of death).

The DA in New York has already publicly announced that he will NOT prosecute certain charges. In other words, he is not even hiding the fact that he is the one who gets to decide what the law is, not the legislators.

In other words, you're wasting your time here. Democrats are burning the country down and in their mob-like frenzy they're proud of it.

I'm watching my 401K and wishing Trump had won. I'm watching WW3 escalate and wishing Trump had won. It's going to suck for all of us, but someone is always going to tell us how much worse it would have been had Trump been the president. Even in North Korea, where there they don't even know the Internet exists, there citizens are assured that they have the most prosperous country on Earth.